Interlibrary Loan

Gerry Quinn · 02 May 2019, 23:36 · from 2019-May.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: gerry at bindweed.com (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 00:36:13 +0100
Subject: (urth) Interlibrary Loan
In-Reply-To: <d46e63b9-608e-6c74-cb5e-21d87bb8b835 at verizon.net>
References: <CAGoL=DCd+q=2w+N7ZY=g4u+t6HgyG0vPUWUh+Jp9+kM3fT_EMA at mail.gmail.com>
 <00e501d4fca4$172fed40$458fc7c0$@hwaet.com>
 <CAKYd2s2rA-SbDpGTuetDwNdoOacXCKXN6ZXy_WWHbkrt0ui0Lg at mail.gmail.com>
 <6B616C3C-C275-419F-9159-C5CF4723F3A0 at bellsouth.net>
 <CAF1072wtrzOBXUjThvHoJgxoQJM=g0UA0UjJVZuqr2=vSn1ttw at mail.gmail.com>
 <e37aa6a2-5316-1639-b57d-6e2a8c27771e at casema.nl>
 <CAF1072xmWjvu+rejEKHi=rieYaUTZpU4o6rGrze4VBMnZ0rCDw at mail.gmail.com>
 <A0CB8EB8-48BB-4D0A-9BA2-19CB943D1343 at bellsouth.net>
 <CAF1072wu135h-+QQ+McwyAV5qrY_Pf=oyx0GeJ27TbCgOaTsZQ at mail.gm ail.com> <CANF
 nLREaCnOFn65jv_yzUHfpD5dcgh4zwQNbSNfh4TO0yGcNyw at mail.gmail.com>
 <986585E3-EE0A-4B1D-BFDB-0081F3FC6D9A at bellsouth.net>
 <CAF1072w7x1ZASHaXaekvfU2EmJYM52PMxMmi19UaUqzhSzY1ow at mail.gmail.com>
 <001201d4ffc1$70b26ee0$52174ca0$@hwaet.com>
 <56EA8A90-B2C5-4FC4-B3B5-D11AFD486C19 at gmail.com>
 <15557608-e4fa-4c60-29d8-d139286c4652 at bindweed.com>
 <d46e63b9-608e-6c74-cb5e-21d87bb8b835 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <7d30d8eb-c7a8-8492-9ef2-c8e1036a9b95 at bindweed.com>


It's the 'carabou' the original anthropologist shoots, early in V.R.T.? 
Page 169 of Gollancz Masterworks edition.? It says the carcass weighed 
fifteen pounds, but it seems an obvious misprint for fifteen hundred.

- Gerry Quinn


On 01/05/2019 16:00, DAVID wrote:
> Yes. This kind of thing is usually handled directly by an executor, 
> such as a child of the author, if not an executive editor.
>
> It's the proofreading that seems to create the trouble, since this is 
> not done by either role. It's the proofreader's job to flag things 
> that *could* be wrong but it's the editor's job to follow the 
> authorial responses. In Wolfe's case that probably means ignoring most 
> of the flags.
>
> I can't find my 5HC. Can anyone identify the object that is to be read 
> as weighing either 15 or 1500 pounds?
>
> On 5/1/2019 10:45 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
>>
>> I think they will edit it and proof-read it regardless.?? I would 
>> assume that a posthumous editor will generally edit with a relatively 
>> light hand (since he cannot consult the author), attend to any notes 
>> (if Wolfe ever used them) and write an addendum outlining editorial 
>> decisions.
>>
>> - Gerry Quinn
>>
>>
>> On 01/05/2019 14:59, Ant??nio Pedro Marques wrote:
>>> I would love something along the lines of
>>> 'Due to the complex and often tricky nature of Mr Wolfe's writing, 
>>> and since he is not here anymore to review the final edit, we've 
>>> decided to print the text as received, with no editing whatsoever, 
>>> the way that would be done for a scholarly print of a historical 
>>> book. Editing with Mr Wolfe's cooperation would have been the ideal, 
>>> but under the circumstances we prefer to let the readers do it by 
>>> themselves rather than introduce our own view.'
>>>
>>> No dia 01/05/2019, ??s 02:58, Eric Bourland <eb at hwaet.com 
>>> <mailto:eb at hwaet.com>> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> >>> Have to make the tone just right.
>>>>
>>>> I too was wondering about this. I guess we should not just stomp up 
>>>> to the gates of Tor Castle and demand oversight of the editing, 
>>>> although in fact this was my first inclination. I'll take a shot at 
>>>> it. This is just a draft, a suggestion, a place to begin. It's 
>>>> challenging to say, in a kind tone, we don't trust your editing esp 
>>>> with Hartwell gone; please don't *$#@! this up. Maybe this . . . .
>>>>
>>>> Dear Editors,
>>>>
>>>> Hello. We're a group of readers from the Urth Mailing List, a 
>>>> mailing list established in 1996 to discuss the writing of Gene 
>>>> Wolfe. We mourn the passing of Mr. Wolfe.
>>>>
>>>> We are all looking forward eagerly to reading Mr. Wolfe's last 
>>>> novel, Interlibrary Loan. As a group, we also mourn the fact that 
>>>> Mr. Wolfe is not available to review the manuscript galleys.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Wolfe's writing is subtle and precise. In the past, his 
>>>> manuscripts have suffered under the pens of well-meaning 
>>>> copyeditors and proofreaders. Typically, when Wolfe receives edited 
>>>> galleys, he responds with STET to many well-intended but erroneous 
>>>> edits. Even small edits, like turning a letter to uppercase, or 
>>>> changing a pronoun, can ruin the intended effect of the story. 
>>>> Every scene, every sentence, every word is chosen and developed 
>>>> with utmost care. Many times, something that seems like an error, 
>>>> is not an error, but a carefully considered component of the story.
>>>>
>>>> Among our group we have dedicated and prominent Wolfe scholars. We 
>>>> would be delighted to offer our assistance during the editorial 
>>>> phase of publishing Interlibrary Loan. We are available to consult 
>>>> with your editorial team as needed, to help publish Mr. Wolfe's 
>>>> last novel as close as possible to Mr. Wolfe's intentions. Our 
>>>> services are offered pro bono, simply because this book means a 
>>>> great deal to all of us.
>>>>
>>>> Please let us know if we can assist. Thanking you for your time we 
>>>> remain
>>>>
>>>> The Urth List
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Urth <urth-bounces at lists.urth.net 
>>>> <mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net>> *On Behalf Of *Marc Aramini
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 30, 2019 7:36 AM
>>>> *To:* The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net 
>>>> <mailto:urth at lists.urth.net>>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: (urth) Interlibrary Loan
>>>>
>>>> I guess I will formulate a sample one and see if we can agree on 
>>>> the verbiage. Have to make the tone just right.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Urth Mailing List
>>>> To post, write urth at urth.net <mailto:urth at urth.net>
>>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Urth Mailing List
>>> To post, writeurth at urth.net
>>> Subscription/information:http://www.urth.net
>>
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>> ????Virus-free. www.avast.com 
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>>
>>
>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net