Urth Net

← back to the conversation

[EXTERNAL] Wolfe & Women

David Stockhoff · 30 Jan 2020, 15:39 · from 2020-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:39:19 -0500
Subject: (urth) [EXTERNAL]  Wolfe & Women
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR07MB449921CA1A9B6213379D636582040 at BN7PR07MB4499.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1272632401.1081888.1580325270444.ref at mail.yahoo.com>
 <1272632401.1081888.1580325270444 at mail.yahoo.com>
 <BN7PR07MB449921CA1A9B6213379D636582040 at BN7PR07MB4499.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <7DD9E77E-5AAE-4DE8-8F6F-197FDC5EC5DC at verizon.net>

On January 30, 2020 7:27:04 AM EST, "Norwood, Frederick Hudson" <NORWOODR at mail.etsu.edu> wrote:
>In my experience, people who complain about having to be ?politically
>correct? are people who want to say rude things and are really
>complaining about not being allowed to be rude.
>
>Rick
>
>From: Urth [mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net] On Behalf Of Gem
>Caccetta
>Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 2:15 PM
>To: urth at lists.urth.net
>Subject: [EXTERNAL] (urth) Wolfe & Women
>
>
>On Wed Jan 29 2020 Ab de Dos wrote:
>
>"I believe the politically correct accuse Wolfe likewise of being a
>christian misogynist?"
>
>
>
>I know Wolfe?s portrayal of women has been discussed many times on this
>list. I found this tidbit from my recent re-reading of Free Live Free
>interesting:
>
>Free says??You like women, don?t you, Mr. Barnes??
>
>?Like them?? Taken off guard Barnes considered for a moment. ?Not
>really. I want them, and since I can?t have them, usually, I don?t like
>them. But I want them, I suppose you could say that. I admire Madame
>Serpentina.?
>
>
>I wouldn?t be surprised if this was Wolfe?s own attitude toward women
>speaking through Barnes. He could find things to admire in some women,
>but he didn?t really like them. Just my guess, for what it?s worth.
>
>The [EXTERNAL] tag in the subject line identifies emails that do NOT
>originate from an ETSU person or service. Please exercise caution when
>handling emails from external sources. Any email that is unsolicited
>and requires you to take immediate action, appears to be forged or is
>PHISHING for information can be verified by emailing the ITS Help Desk.

I see no reason whatsoever to ascribe Barnes' attitude to Wolfe. That's not how authorship works. It's far more likely that the thought occasionally occurred to Wolfe as a question---do I actually like women, or do I merely find them necessary?---and he found it interesting enough to use for building a character's interiority. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20200130/21594db9/attachment-0001.html>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net