Urth Net

← back to the conversation

[EXTERNAL] Wolfe & Women

James Wynn · 30 Jan 2020, 19:25 · from 2020-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: james.wynn at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:25:01 -0600
Subject: (urth) [EXTERNAL] Wolfe & Women
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR07MB449921CA1A9B6213379D636582040 at BN7PR07MB4499.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1272632401.1081888.1580325270444.ref at mail.yahoo.com>
 <1272632401.1081888.1580325270444 at mail.yahoo.com>
 <BN7PR07MB449921CA1A9B6213379D636582040 at BN7PR07MB4499.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <CAL6WgiBv3YnBsn9Q43KdqsTg_v_0Yy++z00y9gFsprz-DZQt1A at mail.gmail.com>

Calling proponents of a position "politically correct" is itself a form of
ad hominem. But if it is going to be *defended* as a category, then...

In my experience, unironic "political correctness" gained a very bad
reputation quite early -- by the late 80s -- because the people advocating
for it demonstrated a very low bar for the definition of rudeness when
encountering ideas they disagreed with and a very permissive bar for the
punishment that should be meted out for perceived rudeness. They also
demonstrated marked blindness for rudeness perpetuated in the name of
"political correctness" (sometimes euphemized "the common good"). Nothing
about the culture of PC has changed since then, but what has changed is an
increased ability of some of its advocates to sequester themselves from the
critiques of it and the various subcultures it spawned (callout culture,
cancel culture, social credit scores).

Rather than engaging inaccurate statements with ad hominem (see above), I
think it is more effective to engage them with accurate speech untainted by
personal emotion.

~ James

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:27 AM Norwood, Frederick Hudson <
NORWOODR at mail.etsu.edu> wrote:

> In my experience, people who complain about having to be ?politically
> correct? are people who want to say rude things and are really complaining
> about not being allowed to be rude.
>
> Rick
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20200130/cc83c976/attachment-0001.html>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net