Crowley Discussion

Michael Straight · 03 May 2000, 15:55 · from urth-v0028.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Michael Straight <straight at email.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: (urth) Crowley Discussion
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 15:55:05
Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0966 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0966.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think if you give it another week or so it'll die down and we'll be back
to Wolfe again. =20

-Rostrum

On Wed, 3 May 2000, Nil_Ultra wrote:

> Has anyone considered forming a John Crowley forum?  Judging by the degree
> of discussion here,  I would say that there is certainly interest.  I enj=
oy
> hearing about other good authors in this forum,  but the Crowley discussi=
on
> has gone to the point of precluding discussion of Wolfe.  Seeing all the
> interest in Crowley I have ordered the bok and am interested in reading i=
t,
> but I am more interested in Gene Wolfe dicussion here than a general
> discussion of excellent authors.


*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net