Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Little, Big: Parliament of the Birds

Adam Stephanides · 04 May 2000, 23:34 · from urth-v0028.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Adam Stephanides <adamsteph at earthlink.net>
Subject: (urth) Little, Big: Parliament of the Birds
Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 23:34:53
Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0972 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0972.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

alga wrote:
>=20
> >From the Kind and Helpful Ratso (what a paradox!)!
=20
I second the "kind and helpful" part.  Many thanks, Nutria, for quuoting
from so much of the foreword.

> > [Quoting Crowley] "I came upon a Persian parable called _The Parliament=
 of the Birds_,
> which
> > supplied me with a plot remarkably -- uncannily -- suited to what I
> had
> > altready thought up.
>=20
> For heavens's sake! Chaucer wrote "The Parliament of Foules" (Fowls)
> which I read in somewhat cribbed Middle English back when I was an
> English major in college, but I don't remember (a) it (though if I had
> the energy I could leap from my seat and consult my old textbook); or
> (b) that there was a Persian original. Where would Chaucer have got it
> from? But I'm sure he did.

I don't know anything about the Chaucer text, so I don't know if it's an
adaptation of the Persian one, which as Tom Urash points out is Sufi.=20
(Crowley's reference to it as a "parable" is a bit misleading as regards
its length; IIRC it's almost as long as a short novel.)  My knowledge of
the Sufi text comes from Borges, who has cropped up on this list many
times before.  I'm not sure exactly where he discusses it; it may have
been "The Approach to al-Mutasim."

The gist of "The Parliament of the Birds," as derived from my memory of
Borges' account, is that the birds all gather together (the
"parliament") and decide to seek the Simurgh, which is a sort of mythic
King of Birds.  The journey is long and ardurous, and many birds drop
out along the way.  Thirty birds make it to the end of the quest.  They
look at each other and realize that they, collectively, are the
Simurgh.  (According to Borges, the word "Simurgh" also means "thirty,"
IIRC.)

So the Drinkwaters, once they have "crossed over," are indeed fairies.=20
But in my reading, it's not due to genetics or geography.  It's their
living their lives so as to be able to eventually reach the fairies'
country (I refuse to call it "fairyland") which turns them into fairies,
although some of them (Smoky and Alice's daughters) get there quicker
than other.  (And there are a few exceptions, like George and Auberon,
who receive special dispensations from the fairies.)

--Adam

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net