PEACE: geography and interviews

Michael Andre-Driussi · 06 Nov 2000, 09:32 · from urth-v0030.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Michael Andre-Driussi <mantis at sirius.com>
Subject: (urth) PEACE: geography and interviews
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:32:21
Message-ID: <urth-v0030-0089 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0030/0089.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Re: the PEACE bit from "Thrust" interview.  I have this item (bought it
when it was new), and I had recently reviewed it myself, but I couldn't
bring myself to post it--so thank you, Robert!  Now others have access to
it, for further clarity and confusion. <g>

I especially wanted to mention that Logan bit.  Based on a town in Ohio (go
look at an online street map right now); but is the fictional town actually
supposed to be there?  Joan Gordon says it is in Ohio (based upon her own
reading, based upon her interview with Wolfe which I haven't read; I don't
know exactly what it is based upon).  The text seems to resist such
certainty: the nearest the text comes to saying Cassionsville is in Ohio is
regarding Quantrill, who was born "near here"; but then the text seems to
retreat from such a tight focus of "here" to being more regional, i.e.,
"the Midwest."  So on the one hand I think of Cassionsville as being in
Ohio (despite the text evidence that suggests Ohio is out of state--I'm not
giving it here, but I seem to remember Ohio being mentioned in a few
contexts where it wouldn't be mentioned if the speakers were located in
Ohio), but on the other hand I think of a fuzzy line between Lawrence,
Kansas and Dover, East Ohio (birthplace of Quantrill).

That _sidhe_ reading mentioned by the interviewer provoked a mini-debate
between Dan'l and myself: he thought it was wild, off the chart, something
we never talk about (thus far removed from the current local consensus); I
thought I could understand it but admitted that I'd been living with the
notion for so long that I may have been contaminated (familiarity breeds
faux-understanding?).

Adam wrote:
>It's a bit difficult to reconcile what Wolfe says here with his
>statements re the house in the Jordan interview that I cited earlier.

Oh good: now we can see that interviews, while providing some data points,
are not necessarily the be-all and end-all.  I mean, not to complain or
anything, but I was starting to feel that people around here were beginning
to give great weight (perhaps even supreme weight) to data points from one
interview or another.  Which is fine, I mean, whatever: the answer that
fits a given reader is where ever he/she finds it (I really don't mean to
knock that); toss out all the lit crit and find all answers in interviews;
but the impish side of me always wants to point out, "Just read _another_
interview."

Because it seems to me that the text of all Gene Wolfe interviews will form
another complex plate of spaghetti to be interpreted: the drawback is that
it is a step removed from the primary text (not to mention the larger
margin for editorial error, mistakes in transcribing, and all the other
details that make a product of journalism different from a product of
fiction writing).  And thus a step removed from "your" reading of the
primary text, whether this reading is wildly idiosyncratic (like the sidhe
reading?) or tightly consensual (the "dead Weer" camp).

I don't want to discard all interview datapoints (I'm happy to use them
when they serve my purpose--when they buttress a point that is also in the
text): I just want to remind us all that the interviews are not entirely
reliable; that conflict and paradox arise when we compare two or more
interviews; and obviously they are not under the same authorial control
that a novel is.

I couldn't find the energy to mention all of this before because, as I
outline above, the whole thing is tangential to my interests, and I don't
want to be seen as raining on anybody's parade. But now that someone else
has introduced the problem, I find myself spending all this time to
agree--go figure!

=3Dmantis=3D

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net