Digest urth.v030.n066
Timothy Reilly · 01 Feb 2001, 03:25
· from urth-v0030.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: "Timothy Reilly" <treilly at ozemail.com.au> Subject: (urth) Re: Digest urth.v030.n066 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:25:25 +1100 Message-ID: <urth-v0030-0269 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0030/0269.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 Redhaven1 at aol.com wrote: > > > I'm just starting Free Live Free and it seems darker and grittier than > > anything by Wolfe I've read yet. Actually, I'm not really enjoying it at > > all. I would just give Wolfe the benefit of the doubt (he's never let me > > down yet) and read it trusting it will be better, but I'm coming to this list > > for advice. Maybe this book was his one dud. What did you guys think of it? > > Is Free Live Free worth it? (i.e. Does it get better?) I gave up after a few pages, quickly deciding that I didn't like this sort of Wolfe - folksy prose and weak humour, as opposed to his more literary efforts like TBNS. I was tring to introduce a well read friend of mine to Wolfe last year, and her local library only had FLF. She reported to me that she read half of it and then skipped to the end "because it was very bad". So 0/2 from this end. Tim *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net