Daemon. And on. And on.

Tony Ellis · 07 Aug 2001, 19:07 · from urth-v0030.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Tony Ellis" <LittleSense at necronomicon.co.uk>
Subject: (urth) Daemon. And on. And on.
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 20:07:05 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0030-0615 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0030/0615.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:

>because said child has read a moderate amount of SF/F, she has no
>problem adapting when the word is revealed to mean something like an
>externalized soul.

And later:

>From all of which I stand by my
>original conclusion: that it is fairly unlikely that a child,
>reading THE GOLDEN COMPASS, will (as you originally put it)
>learn that a word used by Christianity to mean an
>incarnation of evil originally meant something as
>harmless as "spirit."

If the word 'daemon' is at some point "revealed to mean something like an
externalized soul", right at that point the child -knows- that a word with
Christian connotations of evil is being used to mean something as harmless
as 'spirit'. If she's spared my lesson in political etymology, fine. She's
still being given something to think about, which was my original argument.

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net