Digest urth.v030.n173
Richard Horton · 27 Aug 2001, 20:41
· from urth-v0030.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: Richard Horton <rrhorton at prodigy.net> Subject: (urth) Re: Digest urth.v030.n173 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:41:02 Message-ID: <urth-v0030-0677 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0030/0677.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 07:00:01 -0700 (PDT), you wrote: >> >> Do any list members live in or know the greater Chicago area well? > >Me. > I grew up in Naperville, the next town closer to Chicago than Aurora. >> Holly states that Barton is "a town of about 10,000". Is that the size of >> the real Barrington? > >Sounds right. > And I'll note that Barrington Hills was indeed famous as a town where rich people lived -- the Chicago Sun-Times used long ago to do a yearly list of the communities in the Chicago area ranked by some metric which defined affluence (a combination of average home price and average salary and stuff like that), and Barrington Hills was first on that list some of the time. >> She also says that it's "65 miles by car from the Loop." >> Is that >> the real distance from Barrington to the city centre? It doesn't look th= at >> far on my map - it looks more like 30 miles. > >Barrington is about 30 miles from the Loop. All suburbanites use this >metric. > Right. 65 miles is getting pretty far out. >> And, for the record, why is >> that area of central Chicago called "The Loop"? > >It's encircled by The El. Don't ask me to define The El, for God's sake! := -) > It's a loop of elevated (hence, The El) train tracks which surrounds a section of downtown Chicago. The same train tracks are also a subway for a while. >> Could she in real life have made the journey to Aurora by getting a train >> into Chicago and then a Greyhound Bus out to Aurora? > >Probably the only way to do it without a car. > Actually, the Burlington Northern runs from Downtown through Naperville to Aurora, so I don't really think you'd want to take a bus -- just switch trains. >> How long would it have >> taken her? > >Several hours. > The train route might take 2 or 3 or 4, depending when, Express vs. Local, stuff like that. (My memories of how long the trips into the city, then up to Wrigley Field, used to take have faded.) --=20 Rich Horton | Stable Email: mailto://richard.horton at sff.net Home Page: http://www.sff.net/people/richard.horton Also visit SF Site (http://www.sfsite.com) and Tangent Online (http://www.t= angentonline.com) *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net