dual list discussion

William Ansley · 10 Dec 2001, 04:36 · from urth-v0031.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: William Ansley <wansley at warwick.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) dual list discussion
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 23:36:20 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0031-urth.v031.n012.4 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0031/urth.v031.n012.4.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think we should have one list, or two. <g>

I think the Urth and Whorl lists should be combined into a single=20
list, but I would like to see a second list for discussion of authors=20
of interest to this group, other than Wolfe. (They could be called=20
the Urth and Earth lists.)

If this second list is deemed inappropriate or in infeasible, then I=20
think we should just have one list.
--=20

William Ansley

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net