Digest urth.v031.n025

Alice K. Turner · 05 Jan 2002, 03:30 · from urth-v0031.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Alice K. Turner" <aturner3 at nyc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Digest urth.v031.n025
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 22:30:47 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0031-urth.v031.n026.3 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0031/urth.v031.n026.3.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> From: Michael Andre-Driussi <mantis at siriusfiction.com>
> In June of last year I received a letter from Gene Wolfe.  Mostly it was
> about many other things, but in the end he did mention that he was having
> difficulty with the company that was supposed to publish his Tolkien
essay.
> They wanted him to secure written permissions for =3Devery=3D quote, incl=
uding
> the personal letter from Tolkien to Gene Wolfe and the poem by Noyes (who
> died in 1958).  (Those of us who have read the essay also would add Robert
> E. Howard, at least.  There are a lot of quotes!)  This seemed insane to
> Gene Wolfe, in the modern day where Harlan Ellison is trying so hard to
> stop people from web-publishing entire sf stories without permission from
> the sf author.
>
> (Well those of us who have followed such things in US publishing can say,
> "Thank you, J.D. Salinger.")
>
> In any event, Gene Wolfe wrote pretty unambiguously in the letter that the
> project was dead from his point of view.  Non-compliance on his part.
>
> And lo, the essay did not appear in the US book; but it did appear in a UK
> magazine.
>
> So it seems to me that if there was any "rejection" involved with the
> Tolkien book, it was Gene Wolfe's rejection of the terms and subsequent
> withdrawal of the essay.

This excuse is pretty hard to swallow, though I have no doubt that Wolfe
employed it. We're talking about quotations from Thoreau(!), Conrad Aiken,
Robert Howard, Tolkien and Lewis. Perhaps it is true that the estates of the
last two are difficult to deal with, but I would think "fair use" plus the
fact that one quote is from a letter to the author would carry the
day--these are not extensive quotes. I don't know about the publisher, but
Karen Haber is not naive or a nitwit about publishing. There indeed seems be
some crankiness at work, but not necessarily from the publisher, no matter
what Wolfe may have told you.

-a-

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net