Urth Net

← back to the conversation

lost in the big woods

matthew.malthouse · 05 Feb 2002, 11:54 · from urth-v0202.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk
Subject: Re: (urth) lost in the big woods
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:54:35 +0000
Message-ID: <urth-v0202-78 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0202/78.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On 04/02/2002 23:29:06 Joe Eull wrote:

>Regarding sex in the sun books:
>
>I think that Severian's description of his relationships with women has do=
ne
>a lot to cement Wolfe's reputation as sexist. The scene you're talking abo=
ut
>is a particularly affecting one. Without re-reading, Severian seems to hate
>Jolenta for her relationship with Dorcas, and more importantly for the lust
>she engenders in him is a reflection of her desire to be desired. He says
>she made a tribadist of Dorcas, and nearly an algophilist of himself.
>(lesbian, ghoul-lover respectively).

How do you come to algophilist =3D ghoul-lover?

I parsed that as pain lover, ie sadist, or aproaching that.


Matthew



--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net