CWilliams

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 11 Feb 2002, 16:00 · from urth-v0202.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com>
Subject: (urth) CWilliams
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:00:38 -0800
Message-ID: <urth-v0202-139 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0202/139.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hartshorn wrote:

> Specifically, the real-life Japanese kamikazi is an expression of a
religion
> which literally deifies a tribal leader - the Emperor.
>=20
> Catholics regard this with horror.

The horror! The horror!=20

(See, he was right.)

> See the mystical/Catholic poetry of Charles Williams, TALIESSIN THROUGH
> LOGRES and THE REGION OF THE SUMMER STARS, for a powerful expression of
this
> horror.

Ummmm.... While I agree that the Emperor of P'o-Lu is a very powerful=20
image, I'm not as certain as you of several things here ... beginning
with the idea that Williams' poetry was "Catholic."=20

Charles Williams was, depending upon how you take him, either an Anglican or

a weird, possibly-heretical Christian mystic who derived too many of his=20
ideas from the Golden Dawn circle. -- the "either" there was not intended as

a binarism, btw, but as an indicator of the extremes of opinion; mine falls=20
rather in between. Williams was very much an admirer of the early medieval=20
Catholic church -- and quite as much an admirer of the Orthodox church;=20
Byzantium is every bit as much an image of holy order in the "Taliessin"=20
cycle as is Rome (though, admittedly, the image of Byzantium is the image=20
of the holy-ordered Empire: and, while much of the Byzantine imagery is the=20
imagery of the Orthodox churhc, nothing about his "Byzantium" presents any=20
direct challenge to the religious authority of the Pope).

Second, I am not as certain as you that the headless Emperor of P'o-Lu is an

image of the tribal leader deified. He is, I think, an image of a demon=20
deified; of the reality that lurks behind an idol. His being headless is the

key here: he is an Authority with no authority, with, indeed, no mind at
all.=20
(I have occasionally wondered whether Williams was familiar with HPL's=20
Azathoth, but that's a separate matter...) His servants are not humans but=20
octopotowockles of some sort: details slip my mind.

Third, I am not as certain that the word "Catholics" is the correct word to=20
use when you say "Catholics regard this with horror." I think that
Christians=20
of most denominations* regard the deification of a human leader with a=20
justifiable horror, whether it be the Son of Heaven or the Great House.

-----
* Including that denomination that goes under the very peculiar
  name "nondenominational"
-----

All that aside, I very much second the recommendation of Williams' Arthurian

poems, which I have been reading, and occasionally understanding, for a
quarter
of a century now. These poems were praised by both CS Lewis and TS Eliot -
and=20
when these two agreed on anything about poetry, it was a momentous occasion.

Williams published two collections of his major Arthurian poems in his
lifetime,
called (as Hartshorn notes) TALIESSIN THROUGH LOGRES and THE REGION OF THE
SUMMER STARS. These might be available in either of two useful forms.=20

The older edition is an omnibus from Eerdman's, a Christian publisher in the

American North, which is (sadly) out of print but not hard to find. It
contained=20
not only these two books but a third, ARTHURIAN TORSO, which was itself a
sort=20
of omnibus containing (1) a brilliant but unfinished (because he died) essay
by=20
Williams on the history of the Arthurian legends; and (2) an essay by CS
Lewis=20
on Williams' Arthurian poetry, valuable to someone who (like me) finds
poetry
in general and modern poetry in particular rather hard going.

The newer is an edition in the "Arthurian Poets" series, edited by David
Wesley
Dodds, which contains the two collections mentioned above, a number of
earlier
Arthurian poems, and a number of additional poems (finished and unfinished)
CW
had written for a third volume, unfinished at his death, plus a more textual
and less beginner-friendly essay by Dodds.

Amazon US wants to charge you $72.00 for it, and takes "5 to 6 weeks" to
ship:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0859913279/qid=3D1013442372/sr=3D1-5=
/ref=3D
sr_1_5/103-5771779-9450200

Amazon UK will charge only =C2=A313.59, and will "usually dispatch" within =
24
hours,=20
but shipping to the US may make it a push for Americans, both financially
and
chronologially:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0851152910/ref=3Ded_ra_of_dp/202-6=
670
415-5459065

cheers,

Blattid

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net