Horn and Silk
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 19 Feb 2002, 16:51
· from urth-v0202.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com> Subject: (urth) Horn and Silk Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:51:03 -0800 Message-ID: <urth-v0202-177 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0202/177.txt.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm tossing some ideas around here for play. Toss 'em back if you=20 don't like 'em; play with 'em yourself if you do. I think one thing that needs to be addressed is the nature of the=20 relationship of tBotSS to tBotLS, and I think the best model is the relationship between the Gospels and the other books of the New Testament. It has recently been suggested by several persons on this forum that=20 Silk directly inspires LONG, thus giving it a greater level of veracity=20 or accuracy than SHORT, or at least than those parts of SHORT that deal=20 with Horn prior to his becoming bleshed with Silk (and possibly some=20 nameless inhumu). Now, it seems to me that, given that Silk is very much=20 a messianic figure for the people of the Short Sun Whorls, and that Horn=20 is the author of one, but not the only, account of the deeds of Silk, we need to look at the Apostles for our models of Horn.=20 My first inclination is to look at St. Paul. Quite aside from the obvious Odyssey parallel, one could easily see SHORT as in some ways paralleling the missionary voyages of Paul - complete with shipwrecks, the insistence of the principal on earning his way when the local people want to give him all he needs, etc., etc. There is, however, a very serious objection to=20 the use of Paul as a model for Horn: Paul's (well, Saul's) persecution of=20 the early Church, prior to his conversion, is a stark contrast to Horn's=20 position as possibly Silk's first convert, and certainly a convert prior=20 to the founding of the Silk cult. The next choice would seem to be Peter. I don't recall anything in LONG that would parallel Peter's moment of doubt - but then, there's nothing in LONG that really parallels the Crucifixion either: perhaps a less literal approach is required here. At that point, things become a little more promising. Horn, like Peter, is the first to recognize the unique nature of his Master. Horn stays at home (well, new-home) with his people until at last he sets out on a journey which results in his death. But that really doesn't work either. Another option would be John, and indeed one can see some parallels to John's apocalyptic visions in the Narr's experiences on Green and the Whorl. But to be honest, I think in the end any such search for specific=20 parallels is going to fall apart, because Horn isn't any of them - he is a unique character, in a very different situation from first-century Judaea: and at the same time, he amalgamates aspects of at least these three, and perhaps several others of the Apostles and Evangelists. And the voyages of Paul thus become relevant and interesting again=20 (especially if we think of Krait as a possible parallel to Luke ... horrors!). We then see that Silk, as a result of his experiences on his voyage, ultimately is indwelt by the Spirit of Silk ... or is it that Silk is indwelt by the spirit of Horn? This becomes complex and confusing. Comments? Sneers? --=20
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net