"Hour of Trust" corp <> mil./ind. complex

Michael Andre-Driussi · 20 Feb 2002, 20:47 · from urth-v0202.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Michael Andre-Driussi <mantis at siriusfiction.com>
Subject: (urth) "Hour of Trust" corp <> mil./ind. complex
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 12:47:54 -0800
Message-ID: <urth-v0202-189 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0202/189.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I wrote:
>A more important point which has not been articulated (though it may be
>well known): the corporations of "Hour of Trust" are not generic
>mega-corps, say McDonald's or Ford Motor Co, who have somehow acquired the
>Pentagon, etc.  The corporations are specifically the military/industrial
>complex, the weapons makers, who have amassed enough wealth and power as to
>consume their socially decadent host, yet they are incapable of fulfilling
>their new roles. So they can produce such durable goods as warplanes, for
>example--not that they have also picked up these war factories for cheap,
>but rather these war factories have been their cash cows in the 50 years
>after WW2.

But this was one of those cases where, once I had sent it, the doubts came
in. The tree farm, etc.  Things that the military/industrial complex is not
assuredly involved in.

So the corporations aren't exactly the micomplex: they seem to have
absorbed the micomplex, among many others. "Would you like a B-52 with that
hamburger?"

To take another tack: What is the story saying about the military?  On the
one hand, it seems to be saying "The military is a properly an area of the
Federal government [i.e., the Common Defense] and it should not be
privatized or otherwise left to amateurs."  Does it also argue for or
against conscription (that is, The Draft, and all the protest raised
against it)?  I'm not sure.  The struggle between having a Standing Army of
Professionals, or a Standing Army of Conscripts, or a non-standing Army of
Conscripts (that is, the army is raised in response to crisis, then
disbanded), or a non-standing Army of Volunteers.

=3Dmantis=3D

Sirius Fiction
booklets on Gene Wolfe, John Crowley
Now with UPDATES!
http://www.siriusfiction.com/

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net