Leagues and gravity
matthew.malthouse · 12 Mar 2002, 17:58
· from urth-v0203.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk Subject: Re: (urth) Leagues and gravity Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:58:19 +0000 Message-ID: <urth-v0203-334 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0203/334.txt.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/03/2002 15:48:42 Michael Straight wrote: >On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Grant Peacock wrote: > >> I think you are surely right that the orbits are unstable, even if the force >> exerted by Green on Blue is a small percentage of that exerted on Earth by the >> moon. This means that the arrangement is a new one. For those who believe >the >> Blue=3DUshas theory, what must have happened was that the white fountain grabbed >> Lune out of orbit as it came lumbering in and made into a planet. > >But every version of the Blue=3DUshas theory I've seen at least admits a >very long time between Severian and the Short Sun Books (long enough for >Neighbor civilization to rise and fall), which is probably too long for >such unstable orbits. For this it doesn't matter if Blue=3DUshas or not: any of the explanations requires a system stable enough for the history of the Neighbours etc and so far I don;t think we've come up with a mechanical solution that would be. Matthew --=20
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net