Leagues and gravity

Jerry Friedman · 12 Mar 2002, 18:13 · from urth-v0203.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Leagues and gravity
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <urth-v0203-335 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0203/335.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mantis: thanks for answering my distance-to-Lune question so
unequivocally!

--- Grant Peacock <grantpeacock at yahoo.com> wrote:
[I wrote]
> > Anyway, you got me thinking about Green-Blue celestial mechanics.=20
> Stop
> > me if this has all been done.
> Yeah I once posted some similar thoughts, although I didn't do any math.
>=20
> Have you considered the possibility that the narrator is accustomed to
> gravity
> less than 1 g?  I'm assuming the whorl was designed to prepare people
> for Blue.=20
> The fliers in the whorl are perhaps more realistic in a .5g environment.

Reasonable, though we can hang-glide on Earth and the Fliers'
propulsion modules could easily be far in advance of our
technology.  Anyway, wouldn't the narrator or Hoof say something about
how heavy they felt on the Red Sun Whorl?  Maybe you don't feel the
local gravity in astral projection, but if so, they should notice that
the Urth folk walk as if they were nailed to the ground (if nothing
else).

> Our moon exerts a stronger force on Earth than our Sun does.  I say this
> because
> tides are only a bit more extreme during a full moon.  (I forget the
> terminology.=20
> What are neap tides??)  So I would guess there must be something wrong
> in your
> calculations.=20

Tidal force decreases as the cube of the distance, not the square, so
the gravitational force of the sun on us is almost 200 times that of
the moon, even though the tidal force of the moon is something like
three or four times stronger than that of the sun.

(Spring tides, at the full and new moon, are the strongest; neap tides,
at the quarters, are the weakest.)

> I think you are surely right that the orbits are unstable, even if the
> force
> exerted by Green on Blue is a small percentage of that exerted on Earth
> by the
> moon.

It's got to be *more*--Green comes much closer to Blue than the moon
does to Earth, and it's surely more massive.  Anyway, we agree on the
instability.

> This means that the arrangement is a new one.  For those who
> believe the
> Blue=3DUshas theory, what must have happened was that the white fountain
> grabbed
> Lune out of orbit as it came lumbering in and made into a planet.

Rostrum (I think) answered that point.
...

> > Let's also believe Incanto quoting one Gagliardo when he says the
...

Oops.  I meant Inclito, of course.

Jerry Friedman

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net