Urth Net

← back to the conversation

rationale for funky frogs and pedantic brush

maa32 · 21 Mar 2002, 05:33 · from urth-v0203.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: maa32 <maa32 at dana.ucc.nau.edu>
Subject: (urth) rationale for funky frogs and pedantic brush
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 22:33:01 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0203-397 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0203/397.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Someone asked why I bothered with the trematode/frog thing.  Jerry previous=
ly=20
commented that he hadn't seen anything that indicated these polyploid frogg=
ies=20
X. Leavis might have multiple limbs... but that article indicates that this=
 is=20
a common mutation they experience.  Obviously it has nothing (or little) to=
 do=20
with their polyploidy and more to do with their regenerative powers. =20
If I wanted to be a real jackass I could say that the liana's are like=20
Trematodes to the trees, stimulating extra limb growth with their cysty=20
presence (remember that the pit Horn fell into was covered with vines). =20
However, I will do no such thing and just leave it as meaning nothing becau=
se=20
that is pushing the realms of credibility and rationality far beyond anythi=
ng=20
I am willing to do.  (Of course, that was a nice little rhetorical occupati=
o=20
right there, wasn't it?)

Incidentally, the first definition for "Brush" at merriam webster online is=20
"Brushwood".  I am here going to imply that we use a test to see which of t=
he=20
following relationships hold: leaf: brushwood: tree or leaf: scrubbing brus=
h:=20
tree
 Can't brushwood be rough and brown if it's dead?
I shouldn't beat that to death.  I'll leave it alone.  I'm just saying that=20
simple words often have more than one definition ... and in this case the=20
context just seems to insinuate foliage of somekind.  If you still want to=20
argue about the word, then I will copy all of the dictionary definitions ov=
er.=20
We are both saying the same thing about new life to decayed things, I'm jus=
t=20
saying the new sun is granting a different kind of life rather than a=20
resurrection. I guess there is no sense discussing it further - we are "kin=
d=20
of" saying the same thing.
Marc



--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net