lacerations?
matthew.malthouse · 21 Mar 2002, 11:19
· from urth-v0203.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk Subject: Re: (urth) lacerations? Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 11:19:17 +0000 Message-ID: <urth-v0203-398 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0203/398.txt.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/03/2002 01:41:48 Gage Kerrigan wrote: >> Far from bloody shreds 'twas more a mild laceration >> disputing only your contention that mankind did not >> make it in space at all because the idea is flatly=3D20 >> contradicted both in the reported history in TBotNS >> and in the person of Jonas. > > Oh? I said that? Actually... > > Perhaps certain people were so emotionally >disturbed by my claim of "the death of the space >program", which I still believe to be true, that they >did not catch the COMPLETE following idea... "humanity >would leave the planet when Urth no longer supported >life." which, I feel, indicates my knowledge of >space-bound humanity, but only after many years of >procrastination/rationalization. I don't know many >people that would mistake leaving later for not >leaving at all, but hey... But this isn't consistant with what we read in TBotNS. Humanity did go into space - had done so long before - and the planet still supports life. Matthew --=20
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net