Blue moon

Roy C. Lackey · 25 Mar 2002, 23:19 · from urth-v0203.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey at stic.net>
Subject: (urth) Blue moon
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:19:59 -0600
Message-ID: <urth-v0203-439 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0203/439.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This occurred to me last night, and I took it to mantis first today, and he
said to post it all to the list, so here it is:

>You should post this to the list!
>
>>You seem to like to take a sliderule to things, so consider this
>>observation. I'm about 3/4 of the way through IGJ, in my re-read of the SS
>>series. While I am not fond of the idea of Urth=3DBlue/Lune=3DGreen, and =
my
>>observation doesn't compel that reading, if I'm correct, then Blue and
Green
>>are linked in a way that I can only account for if one is orbiting the
>>other. In other words, Blue and Green can not be independent bodies
orbiting
>>the sun in the manner of, say, Mars, Earth, and Venus.
>>
>>IIRC, we are told at the beginning of OBW that conjunction is two years
>>away. We are also told that at its closest approach, at conjunction, that
>>Green is some 35,000 leagues (105,000 miles) from Blue. Conjunction took
>>place while Silkhorn was in Gaon. The war between Blanko and Soldo took
>>place only a matter of weeks after Silkhorn left Gaon. During that war,
>>Sfido told Incanto that Gagliardo had calculated that Green was then over
>>80,000 leagues (about 250,000 miles) from Blue. Hide, at about that same
>>time, told Incanto that Horn had been gone for three years. Therefore, at
>>that time, conjunction was one year past. Therefore, in the year since
>>conjunction, Green had diverged only about 145,000 miles from Blue. We are
>>told that conjunction occurs every six years.Therefore, at the mid-point
>>between conjunctions, Green would have to be at its greatest distance from
>>Blue. Orbital velocities tend to remain fairly constant, afaik. So, based
on
>>the numbers above, Green would never be more than about 540,000 miles from
>>Blue.
>
>Velocities are a little tricky in that they do change: it is "equal area in
>equal time," with the "area" in this case being the triangle created by
>planet at point 1, point 2, and the primary star.  Line between point 1 and
>point 2 being the segment of the orbit.  The world does speed up at closest
>encounter and slow down at furthest point.
>
>So anyway, we are given that the closest is 105,000 miles, and you are
>saying that based on the movement in one year the maximum separation is
>540,000 miles; the average would be 322,500 miles.
>
>>I'm no expert on celestial mechanics, but I find it hard to believe that
two
>>planets, effectively in the same orbital plane and the same distance from
>>the sun, could exist that close together without the planets orbiting each
>>other, or one body being a satellite of the other. No? Where am I wrong?
Is
>>Green Blue's moon?
>
>I'm no expert, but I do like to play with these things.  In the past I
>wondered online whether it could possibly be that weird "dosey-do" trick
>that some of the Jovian moons do--two worldlets in the same orbit, they
>swing by each other and exchange orbits: the slightly lower/faster one
>changing places with the higher/slower one.  This is a boggling thing in
>the real world!
>
>It doesn't seem to match Blue/Green, because it would happen every year or
>less.
>
>Today, with your new numbers, I'm wondering if Green is in a weird orbit
>between Blue and Blue's "trojan point."  Because otherwise it is very
>difficult to see how a normal satellite could take six years to come so
>close and then back off again. (No, the trojan point idea is impossible:
>the trojan point is where forces are cancelled out--it is not a gravity
>point, and as such it has no attraction)
>
>In dealing with satellites it is often handy to use "planetary radii."  If
>we give Blue a radius of 3960 miles (ala Earth), then hey!
>
>Roy's Green Orbit
>105,000 miles =3D 26.51 radii
>322,500 miles =3D 81.44 radii
>540,000 miles =3D 136.36 radii
>
>A large moon is expected to orbit an earthlike planet between 10 and 80
>radii, so this looks quite promising!  (FWIW the Roche Limit is around 2.89
>radii: that point where worlds are torn up into confetti.)
>
>Orbital period (in days) for moon =3D .0074 * sqrt (R^3/M)
>
>Where R =3D orbit in thousands of miles
>Where M =3D sum of planet and moon in Earth masses.
>
>Figuring that Green is equal to Blue, then let M =3D 2.
>
>This gives an answer of . . .
>
>30 days.
>
>6 years =3D 2191.5 days
>
>We can solve this for M, which would then give us the mass of Green!
>
>Shot in the dark: M =3D 1.5 . . . 35 days.
>
>Shot in the dark: M =3D 1.16 (like Earth + Mars) . . . 40 days.
>
>Third shot: M =3D 1 . . . 42.86 days
>
>Well, there's that old problem again!  If Green is a satellite of Blue,
>orbiting at 322,500 miles, it should complete an orbit in 43 days!
>
>Maybe you should post all of this to the list--I didn't think I'd get so
>wrapped up in it so quickly.
>
>=3DM=3D

-Roy


--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net