contra Summa contra Marcus

matthew.malthouse · 26 Mar 2002, 11:08 · from urth-v0203.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk
Subject: Re: (urth) contra Summa contra Marcus
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:08:36 +0000
Message-ID: <urth-v0203-452 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0203/452.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable




On 25/03/2002 21:25:30 Andy Robertson wrote:

>> > > IV. The objection from gravitation
>>
>> > It is not possible that the Blue/Green system could
>> > be gravitationally stable.   Ergo, it is recent.
>>
>> It is not possible _if_ the distances given are accurate.
>
>Yes it is, anything can happen in a four-body system like
>Sun-Urth-Lune-White fountain.

Oh no.  The WF aproaches the sun, we see the effects.  But once there
we're back to a 3 body system.

Matthew



--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net