Urth Net

← back to the conversation

contra Summa contra Marcus

Jerry Friedman · 26 Mar 2002, 21:18 · from urth-v0203.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman at yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: (urth) contra Summa contra Marcus
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:18:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <urth-v0203-471 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0203/471.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


--- Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <ddanehy at siebel.com> wrote:
> > Doesn't the narrator tell Incanto and his dependents that
> > creatures bigger than a man live in the *bark* of trees on
> > Green?  Unless he's exaggerating for effect, I think they're
> > a lot bigger than redwoods,
>=20
> Or, more simply, trees with very thick bark to protect the
> heartwood from giant termites (or whatever).

That's *very* thick bark.  How much room does something bigger than a
man need to live (not "sleep" or "den")--ten feet?  The biggest
sequoia is about 26.5 feet thick=20
<http://www.americanforests.org/resources/bigtrees/facts.php>.  That
suggests ten feet of bark on each side and 6 feet of sapwood and
heartwood?  Possible, I guess, but I took the comment to mean that
Green's trees are to ours as people are to bark beetles; that is, the
trees on Green do grow high, to thousands of feet.

--- He later wrote:

> For such a=20
> jerryrigged theory to be acceptable, it requires some kind of=20
> "smoking gun" _textual_ evidence
...

I just want to mention that the word is "jury-rigged".  "Jury-rigged"!
That's an ENORMOUSLY important point.  :-)

(Unfortunately, there is a word "jerry-built".)

Jerry Friedman

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards=C2=AE
http://movies.yahoo.com/

--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net