"Petting Zoo"

Michael Andre-Driussi · 26 Mar 2002, 21:46 · from urth-v0203.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Michael Andre-Driussi <mantis at siriusfiction.com>
Subject: RE: (urth) "Petting Zoo"
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:46:54 -0800
Message-ID: <urth-v0203-472 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0203/472.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dan'l wrote:

>Ummmm... well, "The Small Assassin" was written _well_ before '60, and
>(if I'm not mistaken) appeared in Bradbury's first collection, "Dark
>Carnival." Indeed, a number of Bradbury's childhood stories are
>exaggerations/portrayals of the very real dreads children feel - i.e.,
>"Fever Dream."

I wrote 1960s when I really wanted to convey the unbounded time past the
Bradbury childhood decade.  I didn't mean to suggest that "The Small
Assassin" was written in any particular time, but that it represented a
contemporary or near-future setting that was horrific, in contrast to the
melancholy sweetness of the authentic childhood time.

>The nostalgic element you mention (summed up in DANDELION WINE) is
>neatly combined with the "childhood fears" element in at least two of
>Bradbury's finest novels: SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES (ignore the
>movie) and THE HALLOWE'EN TREE.

As a matter of fact, as I was keying in the original post I did check
myself against SWTWC, and found myself still in agreement.  While I read it
ages ago, I've never degraded its memory with a movie version.  Yes, it is
frightening, but it is the fear of an evil intrusion upon the golden land
of the authentic childhood rather than the hopelessness of living in a
demonic world of the less authentic present/near future.

That is, my sense of it is that its horror elements no more change the
overall picture than the frightful/ugly bits change the idyll of
HUCKLEBERRY FINN.

But more to the point, "Small Assassin" and "The Playground" are more about
the adult's fears/perceptions about children/childhood in the less
authentic present/near-future; and this has direct bearing upon "Petting
Zoo."

It is just my vague opinion.  I'm not a Bradbury expert at all, and if you
manage to come up with a body of short stories that I have already read
(and can remember!) that contradicts what I'm saying here, then I will
gladly agree with you.

Or you can read "Petting Zoo" and see whether it perfectly matches your
personal sense of Bradbury stories.

Mainly you should read "Petting Zoo."  I like it a lot!  After all this
build up  you are bound to hate it, alas.

=3Dmantis=3D

Sirius Fiction
booklets on Gene Wolfe, John Crowley
Now with UPDATES!
http://www.siriusfiction.com/

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net