Blue moon

Adam Stephanides · 29 Mar 2002, 20:04 · from urth-v0203.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Adam Stephanides <adamsteph at earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Blue moon
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:04:41 -0600
Message-ID: <urth-v0203-509 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0203/509.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

on 3/28/02 11:44 PM, Roy C. Lackey at rclackey at stic.net wrote:

> From: Adam Stephanides <adamsteph at earthlink.net>
> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:19 PM
>> Suppose that they do have independent orbits.  Conjunction is every six
>> years, so six Blue years equal either five or seven Green years.  Hence =
the
>> time between conjunction and Gagliardo's observation is either five-sixth
> or
>> seven-sixth of a Green year.  In either case, the distance between
>> conjunction and the position Green is in at Gagliardo's observation (call
> it
>> position A) is the distance Green travels in one-sixth of a Green year.
>>=20
>> Now at conjunction Green is 105,000 miles from Blue.  At position A Green
> is
>> 250,000 miles from Blue.  Hence position A cannot be more than 355,000
> miles
>> from conjunction (actually, we could get an even better estimate, but it=
's
>> not necessary).  If Green's orbit is approximately circular, then simple
>> geometry (think a regular hexagon) shows that Green's distance from the
>> Short Sun itself can't be more than 355,000 miles, with Blue's distance =
not
>> much more: that is, less than twice the distance from the Earth to the
> Moon.
>>=20
>> This is impossible. [snip]
>=20
> Huh? I don't follow that. Gagliardo's numbers don't say anything about the
> length of either body's solar orbit that I can see. His numbers indicate
> that at your position A the two bodies have _diverged_ by about 145,000
> miles since conjunction. In that one year interval both bodies have also
> circumnavigated the sun. Two years later Blue and Green will have attained
> maximum separation, a distance af about 540,000 miles, then start gradual=
ly
> getting closer together until the next conjunction.
>=20
> In other words, for the two bodies to be in independent orbits, those orb=
its
> would have to be almost congruent--almost, but not quite. Think of the two
> bodies as twin planets, traveling almost in tandem around the sun. The
> attraction of one body for the other causes minor changes in their orbital
> velocities, which average out over a six-year cycle, but account for the
> fluctuation in distance between the two bodies during the cycle. Or am I
> missing something so obvious I can't see it?

I was treating Blue and Green as analogous to Earth and Venus: completely
independent orbits which remain fixed (i. e. don't oscillate).  What you
describe is more like mantis's twin moons chasing each other.

But I think it's probably hopeless to try and figure out what, if anything,
Wolfe had in mind.

--Adam


--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net