Urth Net

← back to the conversation

verbal suggestions

maa32 · 30 Mar 2002, 07:01 · from urth-v0203.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: maa32 <maa32 at dana.ucc.nau.edu>
Subject: (urth) verbal suggestions
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 00:01:35 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0203-517 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0203/517.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Roy, there was one more thing I wanted to comment on about the wording of t=
he=20
dust quote.  It says: "there could be little point in creating us in one pl=
ace=20
and creating us again in another.  Besides, the dust of that whorl can=20
scacrely be identical to the dust of this one."  Now go down a little:
"I could not find Green there, or Blue, or the Whorl, or even the=20
constellations" But he can see the light of the red sun from Blue, right? =20
That's the big objection I keep hearing.  He can't see Blue in the heavens=20
because he's standing on it.  I don't know why he can't see Green - Hoof se=
es=20
Lune later on and calls it Green, "Green came up, bigger and brighter than =
we=20
ever see it on Blue.  Or want to, either." (356).  This makes it seem the=20
same, but then he says (2 chapters later) "Green was up above the mainmast,=20
and it seemed like if we put up the main top it would touch it.  Our Green =
is=20
not as big as theirs, but ours was plenty bright." (366) BUT we know that t=
he=20
moon was closer in Severian's time than it is in ours or Ushas, when the=20
gravity upheavals of the solar system pulled it out a little.  This is the=20
thing: if Green comes closer than the moon (which it supposedly does, at=20
conjunction) then it wouldn't seem smaller if it was big at all.  It would=20
have to be itty bitty, and therefore have less gravity than we have been=20
talking about.  I propose that it is the same size as the moon, but it has=20
moved back to the moons original orbit, but in an oddly unstable one which=20
decays and is then corrected, kind of like a fish tail when you lose contro=
l=20
of your car: it goes to the left and to the right until it is straight agai=
n,=20
at that middle distance between the farthest point and conjunction (note th=
at=20
conjunction is still not as close as the moon appears to Hoof).  It will=20
stabilize at the old moon's orbit eventually.

Read this passage again, as well:
Think of a whorl so old that even its seasons have worn out ... a whorl on=20
which they had jungles like yours once, with wide-leafed plants and many=20
flowers and huge trees.  It is too cold for that IN OUR TIME, and when the=20
people of that whorls speak of the present they intend five hundred years.=20
(384) RTTW=20
Or this one in transit: "everything else was changing anyhow except the sky=20
and the water" (346)  Only the color changes and the stars come out for tha=
t. =20
He also talks about his father's voice: as if the words were being spoken a=20
long time ago.
What does that mean: it is too cold for that in our time? why does he say w=
hen=20
the people of that world speak of the present they intend five hundred year=
s? =20
Isn't that an odd way of saying that the present is anytime in the last fiv=
e=20
hundred years? =20
Normally I would agree with a statement like  the first in a text negating =
the=20
dust being the same, but it is set up so that if you believe that we are=20
related to the Vanished People, then we must be in the same place BECAUSE=20
there is little point in creating the same people in two different places. =20
And there is the old suggestive trick of talking in negatives: no matter wh=
at=20
adjectives are included that temper or reverse a statement, if you want to=20
suggest something to someone you do it as follows:
When Jessica says "Don't Fight over me" in Dune, she means "Fight over me."=
 =20
The negative isn't there because of the way our mind processes statements. =
 If=20
I wanted to suggest something to you without telling you, or I wanted to fo=
ol=20
you, I would use a light denial like "scarcely" : the suggestion of that=20
statement is "the dust of that whorl CAN be identical to the dust of this=20
one." simply by the way it is worded.  I am aware this is opposite to its=20
meaning - are there any linguists or behavioral psychologists who can help =
me=20
support this claim - how linguistic suggestion works?

Silk isn't reliable - he tells Hoof that his ring is Seawracks, but earlier=
 he=20
makes a narrative point of saying that it can't be the same ring.  So which=
 is=20
it?  Can you believe blanket statements like that? (which aren't narrated=20
events but opinions he holds - how would Silk know if it was the same dust =
or=20
not?  That's the difference: you can trust his depiction of most events, bu=
t=20
you can't trust his opinions.)

I'm tired of writing about this, to tell you the truth.  I can see your poi=
nt.=20
(All of your points)  But I can see mine, too; and two or three statements =
in=20
the text can't overturn a hundred small clues that otherwise lead nowhere. =
 I=20
would rather ignore three or four statements which can easily be chalked up=
 to=20
the limited point of view of the narrators rather than ignoring all the lit=
tle=20
clues that Wolfe obviously planted (he he) in their testimonies.
In other words, Hoof has no idea if he is right or wrong when he calls Lune=20
Green - he does it unconsciously.  Silk doesn't know if the soil is the sam=
e -=20
he just makes assumptions based on the knowledge he has - but we can know m=
ore=20
than our fallible narrators, as a precursory glance at PEACE or Fifth Head =
of=20
Cerberus should emphasize.

Marc Aramini



--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net