thanks blattid, but...

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 03 Apr 2002, 22:22 · from urth-v0204.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com>
Subject: RE: (urth) thanks blattid, but...
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:22:54 -0800
Message-ID: <urth-v0204-539 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0204/539.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Marcus Araminius did write:

> Well Blattid, I would love to assimilate the Cummean into the status
> of an inhumu, but (alas) I think Wolfe said she was an "alien". =20

I'm pretty sure the inhumi qualify as "alien," whether Green is
Lune or not. (And really, it isn't _that_ hard to remember: he is=20
an inhumu, she is an inhuma, they are inhumi.)=20

Not that I necessarily think she's an inhuma, either. Just an
idle speculation.

> I'm not sure exactly what that means, but he did say for sure that
> Merryn was NOT an inhumu even though she had difficulty with animals

Not sure of the relevance of this -- there's no particular reason
to think that Merryn is the same kind of creature as the Cumaean;
I had assumed, perhaps foolishly, that she was human.

> Probably not.  Juganu does indicate that there are inhumu on Urth
> with the statement "We are everywhere!" in Return to the Whorl,
> and I would like to say that the Cummean is one, but I think there
> might not be enough evidence for that.

Nope, only that she's some kind of reptilian alien who can simulate
being a human. Doubtless there are thousands of such species in the
galaxy; changeling aliens seem to be as common in the Lupiverse as
nigh-omnipotent beings are in the Star Trek cosmos.

> Hey, "unfortunately"?!  Are you saying I'm like the "bad guy" on the list?

No, only that I really really really don't like the idea of Blue=20
being Ushas. In fact, as weird as some of your theories seem to=20
me, they're generally interested and well-argued, if not sufficiently
supported -- basically, I think you need to distinguish better a=20
plausible theory and a probable one: with the exception of the Ushas/Blue
hypothesis, not one of your theories seems particularly _implausible_,
but most of them are not sufficiently supported by textual citations
to seem _probable_ to me, at this time (though, as noted, I have=20
enough respect for them that I will be watching for such in my next
readthrough -- and am watching for possible clues that GW might have
picked up on & retconned in my current readthrough of tBotNS).

In addition, I did not say "unfortunately." I said,

> I almost hope I'm wrong, as it would make Marc's=20
> theories one step closer to probability.

I meant, of course, the "Blue=3DUshas" hypothesis.

> If my theories prove true is it like the Dark Side of the Force
> triumphing or something?!  Oh well.  "It's better to be feared
> than loved", I suppose.

Grin. You're the third person I've seen quote Machievelli in as
many days. I wonder what's in the air?

--Dan'l

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net