Urth Net

← back to the conversation

brief comment

maa32 · 07 Apr 2002, 04:40 · from urth-v0204.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: maa32 <maa32 at dana.ucc.nau.edu>
Subject: (urth) brief comment
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 21:40:47 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0204-546 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0204/546.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Roy, no big deal, but there IS a scene when he actually is looking at the m=
oon=20
and commenting:=20
"Green came up, bigger and brighter than we ever see it on Blue.  Or want t=
o,=20
either." (pg 714 in SFBC BOTSS, chapter 17)

He is talking about Lune here.  We are saying the same thing.  I'm kind of=20
intrigued by the recent idea that Lune could have near urth gravity. =20
But doesn't the fact that at 30,000 leagues Green is still not as big as Lu=
ne=20
indicate that Green can't be much bigger?  I mean, Lune would have to be=20
really damned close if Green really were larger at all, and it can't be THA=
T=20
close.

Marc Aramini



--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net