5HC a good introduction to wolfe? (was Washington

James Jordan · 13 Apr 2002, 18:52 · from urth-v0204.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: James Jordan <jbjordan4 at cox.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) 5HC a good introduction to wolfe? (was Washington
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:52:58 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0204-597 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0204/597.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====================_99222394==_.ALT"

--=====================_99222394==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Well, Alga, once again you and I have something weirdly in common, for 5HC 
was also my first Wolfe, and thereafter I got and read all I could. But I 
read the whole thing in the Ace paperback. I recall being most impressed by 
the sense of "thereness" that Wolfe communicated (to me anyway) in the 
opening pages. Also, of course, the chilling last sentence of part 1 after 
the whole "antichrist" buildup with "the Master at 666 Street of the 
Humbug" attempting to gain mastery of human beings by genetic manipulation 
-- Wolfe just seemed to have it all: social/religious commentary, brilliant 
writing, sense of place, etc. And that extremely sad scene of the 
shapechanger -- who should have been considered human -- in the dungeon 
hearing the church bells far away in part 3 -- these are hardwired in my 
memory.

Nutria

At 04:14 AM 4/13/2002, you wrote:
>In my own case, I fell for 5H because of its perversity and cruelty. I think
>(I really don't recall) that I first read only the first novella, which I
>found (and find) dazzling, a model of what science fiction could do if it
>grew up.(Does that mean I consider perversity and cruelty to be grown up?) I
>don't know that I thought if it that way; it's just that I am not a
>gee-whizzist, and neither, obviously, is Wolfe. When mantis discovered the
>Proust connection I was really impressed--in fact I gee-whizzed! I don't
>think it was till after I was hooked by the New Sun that I read the second
>and third novellas, which take some patience, but when I did and put them
>together in my mind--well, it's quite an achievement. Formally, it's Wolfe's
>most impressive work, and I simply don't believe the yarn that he knocked
>out the second and third novellas only to ensure publication. Perhaps
>there's a slightly show-offy tinge to it--look, this is what I, and this
>marginal field, can do with slightly shop-worn ingredients. I liked Delaney
>at the time for some of the same elements, but nothing Delaney has written
>is nearly as carefully crafted as 5H, though he too was trying to do
>original things with genre cliches.
>
>Sorry, rambling a bit here!
>
>-alga
>
>
>
>--



-- 
--=====================_99222394==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html>
Well, Alga, once again you and I have something weirdly in
common, for 5HC was also my first Wolfe, and thereafter I got and read
all I could. But I read the whole thing in the Ace paperback. I recall
being most impressed by the sense of "thereness" that Wolfe
communicated (to me anyway) in the opening pages. Also, of course, the
chilling last sentence of part 1 after the whole "antichrist"
buildup with "the Master at 666 Street of the Humbug"
attempting to gain mastery of human beings by genetic manipulation --
Wolfe just seemed to have it all: social/religious commentary, brilliant
writing, sense of place, etc. And that extremely sad scene of the
shapechanger -- who should have been considered human -- in the dungeon
hearing the church bells far away in part 3 -- these are hardwired in my
memory.
Nutria
At 04:14 AM 4/13/2002, you wrote:
In my own case, I fell for 5H
because of its perversity and cruelty. I think
(I really don't recall) that I first read only the first novella, which
I
found (and find) dazzling, a model of what science fiction could do if
it
grew up.(Does that mean I consider perversity and cruelty to be grown
up?) I
don't know that I thought if it that way; it's just that I am not a
gee-whizzist, and neither, obviously, is Wolfe. When mantis discovered
the
Proust connection I was really impressed--in fact I gee-whizzed! I
don't
think it was till after I was hooked by the New Sun that I read the
second
and third novellas, which take some patience, but when I did and put
them
together in my mind--well, it's quite an achievement. Formally, it's
Wolfe's
most impressive work, and I simply don't believe the yarn that he
knocked
out the second and third novellas only to ensure publication.
Perhaps
there's a slightly show-offy tinge to it--look, this is what I, and
this
marginal field, can do with slightly shop-worn ingredients. I liked
Delaney
at the time for some of the same elements, but nothing Delaney has
written
is nearly as carefully crafted as 5H, though he too was trying to 
do
original things with genre cliches.
Sorry, rambling a bit here!
-alga

-- 
http://www.urth.net/
To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request at urth.net

</html>

--=====================_99222394==_.ALT--

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net