Wizard Knight and after

Nigel Price · 14 Apr 2002, 11:02 · from urth-v0204.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Nigel Price" <nigel.a.price at virgin.net>
Subject: RE: (urth) Re: Wizard Knight and after
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 12:02:32 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0204-600 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0204/600.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Oh, ages ago, David DiGiacomo wrote:

>>I would distinguish between underappreciated
>>and low rated books.  I think that if the
>>Soldier series is underappreciated, it's
>>because very few readers are sufficiently
>>well read in history to have more than a vague
>>understanding of it.  CASTLEVIEW is also
>>underappreciated, because it's incomprehensible
>>(but good otherwise).

>>In contrast, THERE ARE DOORS and PANDORA BY
>>HOLLY HOLLANDER are low rated because readers
>>understand them (?), but dislike them.

Strange, isn't it? I really like "Pandora by Holly Hollander" - it's
charming, witty, and well executed - and thought "There are Doors" was quite
brilliant, if decidedly odd.

Is "Castleview" really incomprehensible? The narrative seems radically
compressed, certainly, and there are what may be signs of haste in the
composition, but essentially it is GW doing a sort of late twentieth
century, midwestern Charles Williams, and as such is excellent fun.

For the record, I rate the "Soldier" books very highly indeed and am
constantly surprised that we don't discuss them on the list more often.
Personally, I would love to see "Soldier of Sidon" (or whatever it might be
called) published.

Nigel (who is slowly reading his way through two weeks' worth of accumulated
Urth lists, having been away on holiday, and has now read Fernando Q.
Gouvea's response to David DiGiacomo's posting...he agrees with Fernando and
probably wouldn't have bothered to type out the above if he'd read that
message first!)

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net