5HC a good introduction to wolfe? (was Washington Post
matthew.malthouse · 17 Apr 2002, 13:19
· from urth-v0204.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk Subject: RE: (urth) 5HC a good introduction to wolfe? (was Washington Post Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:19:12 +0100 Message-ID: <urth-v0204-637 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0204/637.txt.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16/04/2002 20:15:11 Jerry Friedman wrote: Sheesh... ><http://groups.google.com/groups%3Fq%3Drec.arts.sf.written%2BWolfe%2B%2522= in%2Bp >erson%2522%26hl%3Den%26selm%3Dabridge-89B1E3.11172601092000%2540news.dcn.d= avis.c >a.us%26rnum%3D1>--I Reading the Urth (and the late Whorl) lists has made me think about the way I read. The regular (and apparently unending) unurthing of things I'd not noticed brought me to the onclusion that I was generally an uncritical reader. Reading that rasfw thread however maybe I'm too hard on myself. If I lack insight then in comparison some of the contributors to the thread are close to brain death. I can understand if ones taste simply doesn't run to the baroque use of language but for someone who'se read it to say "Severian is a man with a good memory" beggars belief. Thanks too Jerry for reminding me why I gave up reading rasfw. :-) Matthew --=20
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net