Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Time, Briah, 5HC, and other things

James Jordan · 19 Apr 2002, 22:03 · from urth-v0204.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: James Jordan <jbjordan4 at cox.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Time, Briah, 5HC, and other things
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 17:03:58 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0204-712 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0204/712.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 02:55 PM 4/19/2002, Blattid wrote:

>Does anyone else beside me remember a comment in an early interview
>or something in which Wolfe suggested that these books may be taking
>place, not in our far future, but in our distant past?

Yep, though it's not "our" distant past. It was part of my loooong=20
interview, online at
http://www.op.net/~pduggan/gwjbj.html

And here is the relevant part, with a bit more for those who might not have=20
read all this before. (I've tried to clean it up a bit, but someday I have=20
to find the tapes and really clean it up.) -- Nutria

JJ: Is Briah our universe? Or is that a universe that resurrected saints=20
have set up in the world to come as part of the cities that they made?
GW: No. I thought of it as a long past universe. Something that we are=20
repeating rather than something that we are.
JJ: I don't know that I have any other questions. It is a universe in which=20
angelic like beings actually have physical control over the universe of=20
stars and suns. I noticed that you had scarabs in the great machine in=20
Yesod. Severian goes through and sees that
GW: Oh yeah, yeah.
JJ: Scarabs push the suns. But that is a past world in your imagination.
GW: Yes, I was looking at what past universes might have been like really=20
and that is how...I began with the idea of what is going to happen to us if=20
we just keep going the way we are going and continue to live on the=20
continent of Earth without ever really going into the sea or going into=20
space and we just wait for the money to run out. The do nothing future and=20
thinking about what that would be. And then I got into the idea of=20
universal cycles. And decided that I would show that this might be a past=20
cycle. Some physicists at least think that the Big Bang is eventually going=20
to be followed by a Big Gnab in which the whole universe coalesces again=20
which will be followed by another Big Bang which is sort of like a=20
succession of universe as piston impulses in an internal combustion engine.=20
I certainly don't have any great emotional investment in that idea but I do=20
think it is a useful idea to play around with. Physics is coming nearer and=20
nearer and nearer mysticism. It has been doing this now for over 50 years=20
and it seems to me that is a fascinating thing that much too little=20
attention has been given to.
JJ: That poses something of a difficulty in terms of Christian eschatology=20
if there is to be a time and there is a resurrection where the world comes=20
to an end. Are you making an attempt to unify those two ideas or just to=20
play with the idea of a gnostic universe?
GW: I was toying with those ideas, I think, rather than trying to make=20
sense of them. Is our resurrection going to be in another universal cycle?=20
Well, yes, maybe it is. I don't know. We don't know what is really meant by=20
the world coming to an end, and God rolling up the sky like a carpet and=20
all that. It is all picturesque language. Figurative language to try to=20
give a general idea to an audience that would not be capable of=20
understanding the actuality. And I am not sure we are more capable of=20
understanding that actuality than they were. It is like the Genesis story.=20
I don't believe in a literal apple and I don't believe that literally=20
biting into the fruit had this effect but if you have to explain to a bunch=20
of primitives how men differ from animals and where men went wrong in=20
differing from animals, this is a pretty good way to do it.
JJ: Who is on trial in The Urth of the New Sun? Severian or Tzadkiel?=20
Because Tzadkiel tells him as the captain of the ship ______________mind.
GW: Severian is really on trial. Tzadkiel is pretending to be on trial as a=20
part of Severian's trial as I remember.
JJ: Tzadkiel means the righteousness of God.
GW: He is an angel of justice.
JJ: He passes judgement there. Apheta, that would mean opheta with an eta:=20
that is speechless. Was that your idea? Opheta with an epsilon could mean=20
forgiveness.
GW: No it is speechless. They talk by centering the sounds that you hear so=20
that you think that you are hearing a voice but they are actually=20
speechless. In a completely silent atmosphere they would be unable to speak.
JJ: Right.
GW: It was just a physical idea that I decided to play with and it has=20
certain philosophical reasons to it.
JJ: As if the universe of words is on one level and there is something=20
higher or above that.
GW: Well, the idea of selection. That we can make ourselves clear to=20
somebody else by selecting things to which they pay attention.
JJ: Okay. Oh... Severian's sexual relationship with her. What is the=20
purpose of that? He is a married man so at one level he is cheating on his=20
wife. He gets aboard ship and immediately takes a cabin near Gunnie and the=20
way you have it written he thinks to himself well it has been 10 years=20
since I have had anybody since Valaria. It seems to be one of his lapses in=20
virtue at that point.
GW: Yeah, I was not trying to show him as being that virtuous a man.
JJ: But here you have an angelic being takes him for the night. What is=20
going on there? Is that an idea of a celestial marriage between heaven and=20
earth?
GW: I think that the ideal of the higher being trying to raise the lower=20
being to a greater height perhaps. And also the attraction that the lower=20
being at least properly should feel toward the higher being.
JJ: So we could interpret that more symbolic than a moral level?
GW: Oh yeah, yeah. Well he is there to be morally judged but that does not=20
mean that everything... The fact that he is acquitted doesn't mean that=20
everything that he does or will do is right. If that is the criteria then=20
none of us are going to make it. None of us are without sin which I realize=20
is a platitude but it is also truth and it is very important truth. There=20
are..., if that is what we mean by good people then there are no good=20
people. What we have to mean by good people is people who are bad but are=20
trying at times to be good with mixed success because that is the closest=20
that we get.
JJ: The holy slaves [Heirodules], Famulimus or one of them tells Severian=20
that he is the center of his race, the savior of his race. That is such=20
Christlike language you can see why interpreters would say well Severian is=20
a Christ figure. But is there a Christ figure in the book, or is he simply=20
for this universe?
GW: In so far as there is a Christ figure it is Severian. That doesn't mean=20
he has to be identified with Christ. He is in a position similar to that of=20
Christ. But really it is a different position because Christ really is both=20
God and man. Severian is not. Severian is a Christian rather than a Christ.=20
But he is been taken as the representative of humanity by whom humanity is=20
to be judged. This I think is what has happened perhaps with the actual=20
human Jesus. He is or was is as fully human as you or I and we are saved by=20
Him. By the fact that he passed. That the corruption did not destroy Him. I=20
think that St. Paul is absolutely correct when he says that Jesus was=20
tempted in all the ways that we are tempted. I think that Jesus was tempted=20
to commit murder or any other sin that you want to name just as the rest of=20
us are. And the difference is that He did not sin.



--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net