Future passed in the New Sun
Adam Stephanides · 22 Apr 2002, 14:14
· from urth-v0204.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: Adam Stephanides <adamsteph at earthlink.net> Subject: Re: (urth) Future passed in the New Sun Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:14:32 -0500 Message-ID: <urth-v0204-768 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0204/768.txt.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable on 4/22/02 8:51 AM, Paul Duggan at pduggan at Op.Net wrote: > But remeber, the text of the Book of the New Sun came into the hands of > Gene Wolfe *after* Severian wrote it and threw it into space in the lead > coffer. Wolfe is just the translator. So Severian wrote in the "distant > past" prior universe and the manuscript survives the singularity (!) and > Wolfe then gets it and tranlastes it >=20 > All references to "the future" should just be taken as refering to how > Severian is in the future of where "we are" in the past universe's > timeline (since the timelines are amazingly similar). I have a hard time reconciling this reading with the references in the SHADOW appendix to "a tongue that has not yet achieved existence" (unless we are supposed to believe that the timelines are so similar that the exact same languages will develop) and "the posthistoric world." Also, we would have to accept that some artifacts and even buildings had survived the singularity, as well as Sev's manuscript. > My only objection to this is theological, in that the theoanthropos then > comes to save everybody at least 2 if not more times. But its just a > novel... This, OTOH, could be explained as the Incarnation "casting its shadow" into the past universe. --Adam --=20
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net