uncut dogs

Andy Robertson · 27 Apr 2002, 18:27 · from urth-v0204.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Andy Robertson" <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk>
Subject: Re: (urth) uncut dogs
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:27:39 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0204-819 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0204/819.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Borski" <rborski at charter.net>
>
> Actually, I've written an entire essay on this and it can be found at:
>
> http://webpages.charter.net/rborski/marsch.html
>

Yeah, I read that, and I got the reference to circumcision.   What I don't
get is what seems to be Marsch's assumption that these two get locked
together like dogs.

Either this is someting about Abo sex, and signals that VRT is writing, not
Marsch: or I am misunderstanding completely.  Still can't find my 5HC.  Can
anyone trace the passage for me?

    hartshorn

    hartshorn

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net