What abos?

Tony Ellis · 28 Apr 2002, 11:27 · from urth-v0204.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Tony Ellis" <LittleSense at necronomicon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: (urth) Re: What abos?
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 12:27:07 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0204-824 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0204/824.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jerry Friedman wrote (of the account of Robert Culot):
>He remembers that his grandfather claimed to see abos in order to
>annoy Robert's father (if I remember right)--not very convincing.

Actually, you remember wrong. He remembers his grandfather as "'a most
honest old man. He would not tell lies to anyone, you understand.'" But
perhaps he is delusional, like Victor. Or stupid, like Doctor Marsch. Or
lied to, like Madame Blount. :-)

And that (alongside the what-a-boring-story factor) is the problem I have
with the no-abos theory, which I have certainly considered many times during
my re-readings of 5HC down the years. There is all sorts of evidence in the
novellas indicating that the abos exist, and to say that they don't forces
you to invent an excuse for every last piece of it. If it feels right for
you, fair enough, but to me it just feels like struggling against the
natural current of the story, as opposed to letting it take me where it
wants to go.

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net