Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Ardis Dahl: American Monster

David DiGiacomo · 08 May 2002, 17:55 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: david at slack.com (David DiGiacomo)
Subject: (urth) Re: Ardis Dahl: American Monster
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 09:55:58 -0800 (PDT)
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-928 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/928.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>I would therefore like to suggest something else to you. Is it possible th=
at
>what Nadan actually notices by the ignited arrack is the burn caused by his
>own laser pistol and that Ardis Dahl is the werebeast he attempts, but
>fails, to kill on the night of the first egg?

No, it's not possible, because...

>... in describing his reaction to the discovery of Ardis's
>secret, Nadan pens the following: "I now know that the thing I killed befo=
re
>Ardis's father's house is real."

If he had seen the laser burn, it would have been obvious beyond any
plausible dissociation that he had *not* killed the thing earlier in the
week.

Then there are the "few filthy rags of clothing" - Ardis would never have
dressed that way.

>What about Ardis leads him to conclude that the thing he "killed" is genui=
ne?

I'm not sure, but I think he would have noticed a "blunt muzzle".


--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net