woof

Alice Turner · 01 Mar 1998, 20:03 · from urth-v0007.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Alice Turner" <al at interport.net>
Subject: (urth) woof
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 20:03:46
Message-ID: <urth-v0007-0574 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0007/0574.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


[Posted from URTH, a mailing list about Gene Wolfe's New Sun and other work=
s]



>We had a long and very enlightening discussion of "Tracking Song" a few
>months ago.  I had a new thought about it last night, literally as I was
>lying in bed falling asleep.
>
>I think the narrator is a dog, specifically a domestic dog who has
>fallen out of (or ejected from) the car his humans are riding in. The
>fall gave him amnesia, favored plot device of writers.  How can you tell
>he's a dog?  He has the marks on his neck of a leash or collar; a
>"birthmark" that goes "from one side of the hair on the back of my neck
>to the other."  He only comes up the shoulders of the Wiggikki, who are
>wolves (few dogs are as large as a wolf).  When he finally meets the
>proprietors of the Great Sleigh, they are angels.  What dog owner is not
>an angel to his dog?
>
>Of course, I'm not saying the narrator _is_ a dog literally, but in the
>same sense that the Wiggikki are wolves, and so forth.  The robots obey
>him because he is "human," not literally, but of all the human-like
>animals they encounter, he is the most human; more human than Mantru,
>who is a-human or ex-human, mostly likely a homunculus (in the TBotNS
>sense). The narrator does exactly what you would expect a loyal dog to
>do: find his masters again; though, being a dog, he's distractable on
>the way. He eats the artificial food because it's what a dog raised on
>kibble would be used to (the moral dimension aside).
>
>Again, I'm not claiming this story is the dream of a dog, but that that
>the narrator fills the dog's role in the story.
>
>What do you think?


I was a major participant in that discussion---I got quite obsessed with it
for a while. And I'm quite taken aback by this new thought---and quite taken
with it too. This is one of those interpretations that I think the author
may never have thought of, and that may yet have truth. I'm going to think
about this for a while. Viz, I had thought about writing about this story,
but I could never find a hook that satisfied me. Why don't you think about
writing about it instead? I can help--I help with this sort of thing for a
living.

-alga-

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net