General opinion of Pandora

Michael Andre-Driussi · 19 May 2002, 04:50 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Michael Andre-Driussi <mantis at siriusfiction.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) General opinion of Pandora
Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 21:50:01 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-994 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/994.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Endy didn't like PANDORA then, and he doesn't like PANDORA now.

That's fine.

OTOH, PANDORA is in excellent company with CATCHER IN THE RYE!

For myself, I like CATCHER better than PANDORA, but I like CATCHER a lot
and I like PANDORA okay.  Haven't read it in years. As it happens, I know
from email that Henry Kaiser reread it just a few weeks ago, and while he
feels it is Wolfe-lite (perhaps the lightest of them all), I don't recall
any complaints.  That it is "Wolfe-lite" is not argued in my recollection.

Endy wrote:
>My first thought on this book was that GW was playing with his fans.   I
>could imagine a scene with his publisher where he made a bet that he could
>write any drivel and his fans would not only buy it, but find some deep
>hidden  meaning it that made it better than the literal words on the page.

Then again, that's nasty. I wish you hadn't written it.

Personally, I think of PANDORA as being in a category with PEACE and THE
DEVIL IN A FOREST: Gene Wolfe making an honest attempt at something outside
strict f/sf genre, in this case the mystery genre.  PEACE was mainstream
and DEVIL was young adult (people were recently complaining about PEACE
being tagged as a "first" novel, but it was a first "non-genre" novel, and
from that vantage point you can see how marketing would remove the
qualifiers, with the mainstream hopes and prayers that a big hit would mean
that Gene Wolfe would never have to go back to writing that escapist drivel
known as "genre" again).

Endy wrote:
>Both books showed signs of brilliance with interesting sequences of action
>or dialogue but would kill the momentum of those moments by slipping back
>into  teen verbiage singsong nonsense.   Did people on this mailing list
>generally like or dislike this one?   Haven't seen too many opinions
>(unless I missed them) when searching the  archives.     --

What does it matter what =3Danybody=3D else says?  You hate it.  That is yo=
ur
opinion.  Tried and tested.  Do you want people to tell you that you are an
idiot?  Do you want people to brow-beat you into reading it again until you
like it?  Do you want people to tell you that you are a genius for "seeing
through all the drivel," for being the brave fellow who says that the
emperor has no clothes?

Or is it the whole consensus reading thing: where are you in the "herd" . .
. middle, fringe, outside?

=3Dmantis=3D

SIRIUS FICTION
booklets on Gene Wolfe, John Crowley
Lexicon Urthus out of print!
http://www.siriusfiction.com/

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net