Liev's Postpostulate

Jeff Wilson · 20 May 2002, 06:03 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Jeff Wilson <jwilson at io.com>
Subject: RE: (urth) Liev's Postpostulate
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 01:03:20 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-1003 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/1003.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>      From:=20
>           "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com>

> Jeff Wilson claims that
>=20
> > Dollo's law is crap; it's violated by marine mammals, and=20
> > moths that alight on trees in once-polluted areas.
>=20
> ...well, no; it isn't.=20
>=20
> In the case of peppered moths, no lost organs are reappearing;=20
> the a:A balance of certain alleles is shifting due to natural
> (or, I suppose, semi-artificial) selection. The "dark" genes
> had always been present as a minority in the "gene pool," became=20
> a far more prominent proportion of the gene pool when industrial=20
> pollution caused the trees they sit on to become darker in color,=20
> and once again became less common as pollution control allowed
> the trees to regain their former light color. The basic papers
> on this, by Kettlewell's and Haldane, are both easily available
> in the Oxford reader on "Evolution," edited by Mark Ridley.
>=20
> In the case of marine mammals, what has happened is that the
> lost organs have exactly failed to reappear -- all marine=20
> mammals still must come to the surface to breathe; no gills=20
> have reappeared. And, while the modified fins we call legs have
> re-modified themselves to a more fin-like structure, this isn't
> a case of anything lost reappearing. The only thing that might=20
> be considered as a reappearance is the dorsal fin on some marine
> mammals; I don't know enough about how those evolved to give a
> legitimate answer to this.

In that case, I sit corrected but I don't see the relevance; the
function returns even if the anatomical detail doesn't. The Frenchmen
don't give the suspected abos a medical exam, they test their limbs'
function. Human hand or polymorphed pseudopod, if it can make nets it
ought to be able to work a shovel.

--=20
Jeff Wilson
How Am I Posting? 1-800-555-6789
"If your SecOp can see you, so can the enemy." -Cpt Law


--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net