Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Vancean influence on Wolfe

Michael Andre-Driussi · 20 May 2002, 19:18 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Michael Andre-Driussi <mantis at siriusfiction.com>
Subject: RE: (urth) Vancean influence on Wolfe
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 12:18:24 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-1017 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/1017.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Blattid quoted and wrote:
>> Hmmm.  I'm sticking on that "gentle" bit . . . :)
>
>Ah. Well, that's a matter of degree, I suppose ... Vancean
>irony, at least in what I've read, is in fact often quite
>strong, but I don't recall ever thinking of it as vicious
>the way, say, Malzberg's or Vonnegut's so often is. Or Twain's,
>for that matter.
>

Oh, gentle vs. vicious.  Right--"gentle"!  (I was thinking gentle as
subtle, underplayed, etc.  All of which is also part of Vance's range . . .
but the novels in question are a tad more broad and farce-ful.)  I can't
think of an example of Vancean irony getting vicious.

CAS and Dunsany also have their joking sides.

Anyway, to be clear--what you are looking for is:

1. THE EYES OF THE OVERWORLD (Cugal's first appearance)
2. CUGAL'S SAGA
3. RHIALTO THE MARVELLOUS [sic]

=3Dmantis=3D



--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net