OT: Vancean mystery novels

Michael Andre-Driussi · 21 May 2002, 15:44 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Michael Andre-Driussi <mantis at siriusfiction.com>
Subject: (urth) OT: Vancean mystery novels
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 08:44:18 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-1035 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/1035.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Adam Stephanides asked me to name the titles to my atomic-scale reviews.

THE FOUR JOHNS is the one that is "screamingly good until it completely
blows out (alas!)";

THE MADMAN THEORY is the one that is "okay, but still better imho than one
of the ones published under his own name";

A ROOM TO DIE IN is very good, one of his best mysteries (of the 6 I've rea=
d).

The mysteries published under "John Holbrook Vance" I've read are: THE
PLEASANT GROVE MURDERS (Joe Bain #2), THE FOX VALLEY MURDERS (Joe Bain #1),
and THE DEADLY ISLES.

Personally I would rank them all this way:

1. the Joe Bain books
2. A ROOM TO DIE IN
3. THE MADMAN THEORY
4. THE FOUR JOHNS
5. THE DEADLY ISLES

Adam wrote:
>Iirc, these are all from the series of paperback tough-guy mysteries
>published under Queen's name, but without Ellery as the detective.

Yes, that is correct.

>http://www.hycyber.com/MYST/queen_ellery.html lists FACE TO FACE, which ii=
rc
>is a "regular" Ellery Queen novel, as "ghostwritten by Jack Vance?", though
>if you follow the link to "Novels Ghostwritten by Others," the attribution
>is repeated without the question mark.

I have not seen that attribution before.  It is not given in my Galactic
Central working bibliography.  Nor do I find it in Cunningham's JACK VANCE:
CRITICAL APPRECIATIONS AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY. Further investigation is in
order!

=3Dmantis=3D

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net