uncut dogs

Andy Robertson · 21 May 2002, 15:46 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Andy Robertson" <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk>
Subject: Re: (urth) uncut dogs
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 16:46:05 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-1036 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/1036.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Andre-Driussi" <mantis at siriusfiction.com>
> No, hartshorn/Quartet are right (agreeing with Scribners hc), Ace is in
> error (add that one to the "Many Pink Butterflies" instead of "Mary Pink
> Butterflies" error).

> "they would tie, the two of them" (227)


Well, back where we were then.

Why "tie"?  And how/why is this specifically linked to being uncircumcised?


    hartshorn



--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net