Urth Net

← back to the conversation

TBOTSS and colonialism

Adam Stephanides · 22 May 2002, 15:05 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Adam Stephanides <adamsteph at earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) TBOTSS and colonialism
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 10:05:00 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-1045 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/1045.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

on 5/21/02 2:51 AM, Andy Robertson at andywrobertson at clara.co.uk wrote:

(I'll refrain from comment upon hartshorn's excursus into real-world
politics.)

> The astonishing thing to me, really, is that you should find Wolfe's
> writings on the subject of interspecies conflict odd.
>=20
> The inhumi are *not* another human race.
>=20
> Why the hell *should* an alien species like the inhumi be peacefully
> inclined towards humanity?
>=20
> Why should humanity not strive to exterminate its enemies?
>=20
> It is a completely real picture of the natural processes of evolutionary
> rivalry and conflict.

I don't deny that within the fictional situation that Wolfe has set up, the
colonists are justified in killing the inhumi.  But, as I said, Wolfe must
have had a reason for giving the inhumi such a large role, and presumably it
wasn't to tell us what humanity should do if it ever does come across a race
of shape-shifting alien vampires.  What Wolfe is essentially doing is
biologizing evil, which is a dangerous thing to do whatever one's conscious
intentions.  And depicting the relations between groups in terms of
"evolutionary rivalry and conflict" to the death is also dangerous, given
this century's history.

> Now let's really, really,  stir this one up.
>=20
> Inhumi =3D jews?

Actually, if the inhumi are indeed modelled upon any real-life group, my
guess would be the Palestinians, given Wolfe's post-9/11 remarks that the
U.S. should give Israel a free hand, and given the Exodus theme in TBOTLS.

And alga wrote:

> You mustn't forget that the inhumi are demons, quite explicitly. This is =
on
> my mind because I've just been reading a book called -Demon Lovers- about
> the accusations of sex with devils during the Renaissance witchhunts. So =
you
> can't simply look at it as a colonial novel (I have a weakness for coloni=
al
> novels, btw).
[snip]
> I was offended by
> Wolfe's treatment of Jahlee on first reading (and the crude melodrama of =
the
> writing) but in the strict Catholic reading you can't get away from the f=
act
> that a demon is a demon and will revert to type. (Origen, who took the
> thoughtful and humane position that all of God's creatures could eventual=
ly
> be saved, was anathematized over and over again as a heretic.) The inhumi
> yearn to be human (that's what Origen said too) but they cannot become hu=
man
> except in illusion in this book, no matter how kindly they are treated. So
> your final question is answered by Wolfe's irony. Through Horn's (and
> Wolfe's) relations with Fava, Krait and Jahlee (by far my favorite
> characters in the book) we grow affectionate toward them. But they cannot
> help their natures, as the scorpion said to the frog as both were dying.


Yes, I can see the resemblance of the inhumi to demons.  But they are also
an indigenous species on a colonized planet, whether Wolfe intended to write
a colonial novel or not (and I agree it doesn't read like one).  And again,
it seems quite dangerous to me to depict what is, in effect, a race as
compelled by its nature to be evil.

Once again, I am not claiming that Wolfe himself is racist, or intends to
promote racism, or that reading TBOTSS would make someone a racist.  But I
am saying that the philosophy Wolfe's portrayal of the inhumi seems intended
to convey is one that can easily, and has in the past, fostered racism,
whatever Wolfe's intentions.

--Adam


--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net