Liev's Postpostulate

Adam Stephanides · 23 May 2002, 14:30 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Adam Stephanides <adamsteph at earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Liev's Postpostulate
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 09:30:45 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-1055 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/1055.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

on 5/20/02 5:49 AM, Tony Ellis at LittleSense at necronomicon.co.uk wrote:

> Wolfe
> goes out of his way to show us that Victor was beaten until he bled for
> getting it wrong: that's a pretty powerful incentive for getting something
> right if it is physically possible to do so.

A psychological inability to do something can be just as real, and just as
resistant to being overcome by force, as a physical inability.
=20
> I find it hard to believe that, in a story where tool-use is of crucial
> significance, Wolfe has devoted a whole page to the phenomenon of Victor's
> bad handwriting, and topped it off with a paragraph-long definition of Do=
llo
> 's Law, in italics yet, just to say "Victor's poor handwriting was a bad
> habit."

In fact Dollo's law refers not to organs that have lost their function, but
to organs that have physically shrunk or disappeared.  Presumably you aren't
going to argue that the prehistoric colonists went through a stage when they
had tiny or no hands.

I think you're right, though, that there must be a larger reason why Victor
cites Dollo's law.  I'd suggest that it's connected to his statements that
he is an animal and does not really speak: having raised (he thinks) as an
animal, he now cannot become a human, but can only imitate a human.  Or
perhaps at this point he still believes himself an aborigine.  But in any
case, I don't think he's referring to the evolution of the Annese' hands.

>> I vaguely recall something like this being discussed, but don't recall a=
ny
>> of the arguments for it. The only thing I can find which could even be
>> thought to suggest that she is either Annese or can change her appearance
> is
>> the statement "In the bright daylight he could see fine wrinkles near her
>> eyes; the girl was aging" (267), and to me it seems far more likely that
>> this means no more than what it says.
>=20
> In a different story, perhaps. But in one where a key theme is
> spot-the-alien

It's a key theme on this list; I'm not convinced it's a key theme in the
book itself.  The only "alien" whom there's much evidence for is Victor; the
other alien candidates have been extrapolated based on one or two tiny
details.

> and where we've already been given the example of  Victor's
> supposedly Annese mother making herself look older to avoid sleeping with
> men she didn't like, it's a detail that assumes far greater significance.
=20
But Cassilla looks worn after she's slept with two men, not before.  If she
were able to make herself look unattractive at will, like Victor's mother,
she presumably wouldn't be exploited as much as she is.

The theme of slavery and exploitation is far more prominent in 5HC than is
"spot-the-alien," and my reading of the quote fits this theme very well,
indicating that Cassilla is worn out by her abuse.

--Adam

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net