TBOTSS and colonialism

Adam Stephanides · 27 May 2002, 13:50 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Adam Stephanides <adamsteph at earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) TBOTSS and colonialism
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 08:50:36 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-1093 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/1093.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

on 6/1/02 2:37 PM, Andy Robertson at andywrobertson at clara.co.uk wrote:

> It is the question of how you behave when you have the ability  -  thrust
> upon you by the horribly cruel machinery of Evolution - to create a living
> soul within the body of a bloodsucking, predatory, reptile:  to create a
> thing that then screams and weeps sincere psychic tears as it **continues=
**
> to prey on and kill human beings.
>=20
>=20
> It is not a test with an easy answer.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> It seems to me that you are hopelessly thrall to the comfortable Star Trek
> view of the universe, and the Other within it.

It was specifically the view of relations between groups as an evolutionary
struggle to the death that I denied was "reality."

But no, I don't believe that love will conquer all.  But I also don't
believe that there are any races which are unredeemable by nature.  I'm also
doubtful that we will encounter an alien species which is unredeemable by
nature in the future.  The idea of such races comes from stereotypes of the
Other and from pulp sf, rather than reality.

But the more I think about it, the more dubious seems the idea that Horn's
error is loving the inhumi.  Yes, bringing Jahlee home was a spectacular
error of judgment (for that matter, sleeping with her was an error of
judgment).  But as Hoof would say, one can love someone while being aware of
their failings.  Horn knew that Jahlee was an amoral and bloodthirsty (no
pun intended) being, and should have realized that by bringing her to where
Nettle was he was leading her into temptation big time.  And, as I wrote
earlier, "love" has very little to do with Horn's relations with Juganu.
OTOH, had Horn not trusted Krait, he would have died on Green much earlier
(at least this is implied, iirc).

So maybe my original post which started this whole discussion was wrong, and
Horn's policy of treating the inhumi as humans fails because of his own
weakness, not because it's inherently doomed.  I don't know.

--Adam=20

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net