FLF

James Jordan · 28 May 2002, 15:32 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: James Jordan <jbjordan4 at cox.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) FLF
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 10:32:38 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-1098 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/1098.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 11:07 PM 5/27/2002 -0500, the Borski wrote:
>A few random notes from my weekend reread of _Free Live Free_ that may=3D20
>still be pertinent, the vast majority of what I would have said having=3D
 already
>been duly noted, primarily by Mssrs. Nutria and Ansley back in V.30.
>
>First the characters, Nutria casting them thusly:
>
>"Now, in WWOz the three Oz characters are animal, vegetable, and mineral.=
=3D
=3D20
>I don't know how Wolfe might be playing with this. But they are also mind,
>emotion, and will. Stubb - very smart; mind (Scarecrow; vegetable?) Candy -
>very loving; emotion (Tin Woodman; mineral?) Serpentina - very determined;
>will (Lion; animal?) Which leaves Barnes as Dorothy, and Little Ozzie as
>Toto. And of course Ben Free as the Wizard. Free is not a humbug, but I
>think he is trapped in 'Oz', and only escapes through death. Free does move
>upwards (compare the wizard's balloon)."
>
>I'd like to propose a somewhat different mapping. (My apologies if this has
>been suggested before, but I couldn't find it anywhere in the archives.)
>Candy Garth is the very obvious Dorothy; she sings like the Dorothy of
>cinematic Oz and Garth seems like one of those nested names Wolfe uses so
>frequently (GAil, doRoTHy). Osgood Barnes, a.k.a. "Ozzy," is the wizard
>manqu=3DE9, the seller of cheap tricks and novelties. Madam Serpentina is =
the
>witch. (Duh.) And little Stubbs, who's described as jockey size, is a
>munchkin. This leaves only Ben Free, the true wizard--and someone whose
>"magic" may also include changing water into wine and raising the dead (see
>William Ansley's post).

         This sure looks right, but I'll bet I'm right also. Surely Wolfe=
=3D20
has read *Ringworld,* where the Oz characters are switched, so that the=3D20
lion-like character lacks brains, the grotesque scarecrow puppeteer lacks=
=3D20
courage, the Dorothy-girls lacks a heart, etc. Knowing what we do of Wolfe,=
=3D
=3D20
and the fact that Christian imagery and also Popeye stuff is laid over the=
=3D
=3D20
characters, I would not be surprised if both your and my schemes are=3D
 "right."


>One, of course, may also impose, as the author himself does, a Popeye
>schema. Osgood =3D3D Popeye; M. Snake =3D3D Olive; Little Ozzy =3D3D Sweep=
ea;=3D
 Stubbs =3D3D=3D20
>Wimpy; and Candy =3D3D Brutus???

         Do you think maybe the Pop-EYE overlay has something to do with=3D=
20
the theme of seeing clearly, as you set it out? Or maybe it's just more=3D20
"America" stuff.


>In addition, several of the characters have M's associated with their=3D
 names.
>Madam Serpentina a.k.a. Marie; Osgood M. Barnes; Catharine M. Garth. But=
=3D20
>what does the M stand for? An upside down W? A very oblique tip of the hat=
=3D
=3D20
>to L. Frank Baum? (M being the next letter after L and this being Wolfe's
>topsy-turvy version of  "The Wizard of Oz." Someone, somewhere, does say
>something about being in the wrong movie.)

         Dunno, of course. But I have toyed with Marie as some kind of=3D20
cypher for the Church/Mary. Ben Free is some kind of "Americanized Christ=
=3D20
figure," and the new group he forms is a kind of new Church, and Marie is=
=3D20
part of it.


>Then there's the "house" of Ben Free--Garth also meaning yard, Stubb (from
>the German Stube, as Wolfe tells us) meaning room, and Barnes being where
>you put the cows and horses.

         Sounds right, especially if this "house" of persons "elected" by=
=3D20
Ben (Christ) Free is some kind of new "America"-church.


>Shared optical difficulties also prevent quite a few of the characters from
>seeing properly. Osgood has a glass eye, Madam Serpentina wears contacts,
>Stubbs has bottle-bottom glasses, and Free is described as poor sighted but
>yet is able to detect someone's irises contracting in basement murk.=3D
 Perhaps
>the latter plays off the notion as God-as-clear-sighted and the rest of us
>as His myopic underlings stumbling around in the dark.

         I took it as the blindness (imperception) of sin (they all have=3D=
20
besetting sins) that some kind of "grace" needs to overcome. Free also has=
=3D
=3D20
poor physical eyesight (thus being like those he is saving), but has clear=
=3D
=3D20
in-sight, which is what the characters need to arrive at.


>Considering that FLF was written by Wolfe while on break from _Urth of the
>New Sun_, might we describe the High Country shadow government of Ben Free=
=3D
=3D20
>as a bunch of "High-rodules"?

         Perhaps. But given that it was written then, I think we are=3D20
entitled to look for some of the same themes, such as obviously travelling=
=3D
=3D20
the corridors of time.

Nutria


--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net