TBOTSS and colonialism

Michael Straight · 30 May 2002, 18:03 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Michael Straight <straight at email.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: (urth) TBOTSS and colonialism
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 14:03:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-1141 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/1141.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 30 May 2002 matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk wrote:

> For example a death by smallpox is tragic in a humanist view, but not
> evil. It's just one of those chances that might happen.  It takes some
> additional input - such as the belief in a deity and a directed purpose to
> such an eventuality - to make such a death an evil.
>=20
> So we (humanist or deist alike) consider murder wrong. To kill with intent
> is evil.  To cause death inadvertantly is not, however tragic.

I think the Christian way of expressing this is that death by smallpox is
evil (one of the evils unleashed by humanity's estrangement from God) and
murder is sinful.

The humanist equivalent is probably that death by smallpox is bad and
murder is evil.

Thus the confusion about the word 'evil'.

-Rostrum

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net