Cim Glowing

Robert Borski · 31 May 2002, 06:10 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Robert Borski" <rborski at charter.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Cim Glowing
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 01:10:50 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-1150 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/1150.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Blattid having rebutted:

>I've never read Jubilees, and don't know of any church, or
> synagogue, for that matter, which considers it to be canon
> (though it is cited in several of the canonical texts...); I
> thus claim that my basic statement above (that this is not a
> "biblical tradition") stands unaltered.

No argument there, and I should probably have used something a little more
qualitative like "according to non-canon tradition" or "according to the
Book of Jubilees" when I talked about the Qayin-Awan connection.

> When you say it is attributed to "the Lawgiver," are you
> referring to Moses, or to the Deuteronomist, or ...?

To Moses, who supposedly received Jubilees as a revelation from the Angel of
the Presence.

Robert Borski





--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net