TBOTSS and colonialism

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 31 May 2002, 15:26 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com>
Subject: RE: (urth) TBOTSS and colonialism
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:26:34 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-1152 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/1152.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Matthew wrote...

> Thought just appeared out of the blue so perhaps nonsense: if humans
> volunteered [their blood] and inhumu acceded to it would it not =3D
create=3D20
> a dependence that ultimately could make the inhumu a slave race?=3D20

Actually, that had occurred to me also ... and immediately=3D20
(inevitably?), the situation wrt the US and OPEC came to mind,
with US in the r=3DF4le of the inhumi ...

> Potentially a solution as ethically problemtaic as the problem.

Sort of. But predators _are_ dependent upon their prey; in the=3D20
case of the inhumi, granted, the dependence is a little different=3D20
in that other prey are available but won't give them sentience=3D20
(and, just possibly, souls). But changing a predator/prey=3D20
situation to one of mutual benefit and dependency seems to me
to be as close to a purely good thing as you get in the Fallen
world.

> This would't happen if all human doners were altruistic.  But=3D20
> isn't our premis that they (we?) can't be so consistantly and
> universally?

Depends on what you mean by "altruistic" -- if you mean acting
from emotionally altruistic motives, your reading of the premise=3D20
is correct; however, it is possible to behave altruistically for=3D20
reasons other than altruism (this is actually one of the major
topics in current* evolutionary biology); if the inhumi were to
develop, from their human "victims," this kind of altruistic
character, it would be every bit as beneficial to both sides as
"emotional" altruism, and quite probably more so for the inhumi.

-----
* Where "current" means "long enough ago to be considered an
  exciting topic for current popular-science books.
-----

In other words, _assuming_ that we are right in believing that
their character is sufficiently susceptible to alteration by=3D20
the character of those they prey upon, _then_ the forging of a=3D20
mutually-beneficial d=3DE9tente would not require that it be only
saints who open their veins to the inhumi -- utilitarian/
pragmatists will do as well.

--Blattid

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net