TBOTSS and colonialism

Jerry Friedman · 31 May 2002, 20:05 · from urth-v0205.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) TBOTSS and colonialism
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 13:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <urth-v0205-1156 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0205/1156.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

--- matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On 31/05/2002 05:12:16 Jason Ingram wrote:
>=20
> >On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 12:41 PM, Jerry Friedman wrote:
> >[. . .]
> >> To get back to something more to the point, why doesn't Silkhorn
> >> try "donating" blood to inhumi?  That would seem like an excellent
> >> attempt at making improvements.  He's too humble to think he
> >> would help?  Too squeamish?  Wolfe didn't like the echoes of the
> >> Eucharist?
> >
> >I believe that he did so, deliberately opening his veins several times
> >to feed an inhumu or two.  It seemed that this altered their subsequent
> >behavior, though Jahlee presents a counter-example (I believe that she
> >was a recipient).  I couldn't opine whether Silkhorn's intent was
> simply
> >to prevent them from preying on others or he had something else in mind
> >without rereading.

Anybody have a cite?

> Thought just appeared out of the blue so perhaps nonsense: if humans
> volunteered this and inhumu acceded to it would it not create a
> dependence
> that ultimately could make the inhumu a slave race?  Potentially a
> solution as ethically problemtaic as the problem.

Well, we're not the slaves of OPEC (Dan'l's example) or of utilities,
still less of farmers.

I think the real problem along these lines might be people forcing
slaves to give the inhumi blood--those slaves who are adjusted to
their condition, predisposing the future generations of inhumi to
be slaves.  See the April _Scientific American_ for some not overly
original notes on the psychology of slavery.

> This would't happen if all human doners were altruistic.  But isn't our
> premis that they (we?) can't be so consistantly and universally?

Yes, or at least Wolfe's premise, but I agree with Dan'l that
ordinary economic behavior and enlightened self-interest could lead
to an improvement on the situation in the trilogy.

Jerry Friedman

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net