Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Some problems if the Pancreator/Outsider is theHoly

matthew.malthouse · 11 Jun 2002, 07:14 · from urth-v0206.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk
Subject: Re: (urth) Some problems if the Pancreator/Outsider is theHoly
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:14:14 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0206-1193 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0206/1193.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable




On 11/06/2002 06:58:32 Roy C. Lackey wrote:

>In addition to the objections raised by others, there are all those
stories
>in the Brown Book, clearly recognizable to students of Classical
mythology
>as founded on Earth's mythology. It also contains a direct quote from
>Genesis, and another from Marlowe's FAUSTUS. No. No. No. Urth is in our
>Earth's far future.
>
>Facts aside, as well as theological difficulties, the notion of Severian,
>turning water into wine, being baptized, dying and being resurrected, a
>world savior, etc., in a previous iteration of creation, makes him the
>prototype for Jesus. Kind of cheapens the whole Holy Spectacle, doesn't
it?
>Putting the cart before the horse.
>
>Not to mention it plays hell with Nick Gevers' idea of placing 5HC in the
>SUN universe. A separate creation with an Earth, complete with Ireland,
>Scotland, Wales, and New York City, DAVID COPPERFIELD, and Catholic
saints
>(all mentioned in the text), stretches credulity past all endurance.

I agree. The internal evidence of tBotNS is only consistant with it being
set in the very far future.

I'd be curious to know if the external statements were delivered
ex-cathedra or if they were accompanied by any explanation or rational
that gives reason for the change.  I have to suspect pure mischief.

Matthew



--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net